is probably an incorrect theory
A theory that repeatedly fails to confirm expected predictions after extensive research may be deemed unreliable or invalid. Such persistent discrepancies suggest that the underlying assumptions or mechanisms of the theory may be flawed or incomplete. In scientific practice, theories must be testable and predictive; if they consistently fail these criteria, researchers are likely to seek alternative explanations or develop new theories. Ultimately, the inability to validate a theory can hinder scientific progress and understanding in that area.
A theory that repeatedly fails to confirm expected predictions after extensive research likely needs to be modified or reconsidered. Persistent discrepancies between predictions and observations suggest that the underlying assumptions or mechanisms may be flawed. While further research could be beneficial, continuing to uphold a theory that consistently fails to align with empirical evidence may hinder scientific progress. Thus, it is essential to adapt or replace such theories to align with observed reality.
Variables are expected to be related to one another based on the assumptions and logical reasoning within a theory. The theory specifies the nature and direction of relationships between variables, guiding the researcher's predictions. These relationships can be tested through empirical research to evaluate the theory's validity.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
A scientist can prove a theory by conducting experiments, collecting data, and analyzing results to see if they consistently support the predictions made by the theory. The more evidence that aligns with the theory's predictions, the stronger the support for the theory. Additionally, peer review and replication of results by other scientists help confirm the validity of a theory.
A few celestial objects appear to have retrograde motion.
A collection of hypotheses that have been repeatedly tested and supported by substantial evidence is called a theory, not a prediction. Predictions are specific forecasts derived from theories and hypotheses about what will happen under certain conditions. Theories provide a broader understanding of a phenomenon and can generate multiple predictions.
A thoery is a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
Aristotle's geocentric theory failed to match the expected predictions because it incorrectly placed Earth at the center of the universe, leading to inaccuracies in predicting the motions of celestial bodies. With the advancement of observational astronomy and the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus and later confirmed by Kepler, it became evident that Earth revolves around the Sun, not vice versa.
Sivashanmugam is the author of the expected knowledge theory.
completely different predictions. relativity predictions match experiment, ether predictions don't.
a Theory!