They weren't a hoax. The footage could not be duplicated *today*, let alone back then. Kubrick's "2001" shows how lame even state-of-the-art lunar effects looked back then. The only way Kubrick had of hiding wires was to photograph from beneath the person, so their own bodies blocked the wire from view. Want to try that on a Rover drive? <G>. The best wire effects were done by Gerry Anderson's people back then. No way they could have done the Moonwalks, just take a look at his stuff. The thing with Kubrick is that since someone made a mockumentary about him doing the Apollo effects, some people weren't bright enough to know the mockumentary was a joke. See below some links I am leaving that help make things a lot clearer.
Certain ASPECTS of the moon flights, for various reasons incuding atmospheric density, the vacuum of space, excessive solar glare, could bot be photographed on Live TV and the broadcasters artfully substituted animated sketches of re-entry, stages separating, and so on, some also used disassemblable scale models of the Saturn V rocket, for example Cronkite. Then some asked- if part of this was faked ,could not the whole thing have been Hoked up? By the way about a year ago he Live TV tapes of the Moon Landings mysteriously disapperared from a vault in Washington! Very Interesting. There are a number of logical inconsistencies- and thick books have been written on this subject. certain aspects of the mission could not be photographed, and simulation was used-and it was generally flashed on the screen(Simulation) or (Animation) the announcer would explain that the capsule was beyond the view angle of telephoto cameras, or could not transmit due to the hot gases of re-entry disabling electromagnetic systems- which is true. But there is no evidence entire missions were Hoked up.
There was no moon hoax. The moon landings were real.
It wasn't, the moon landings were real.
No. Like the other 5 moon landings, it was real.
The moon landings were real. 12 men have walked on the moon.
There is no evidence to support the claim that the moon landing was a hoax. Multiple lines of evidence, including photos, videos, and samples brought back by astronauts, confirm the authenticity of the moon landing. Various independent investigations and scientific analyses have also debunked the hoax theories.
Yes, they did. Still, some believe that it was a hoax filmed in a studio.
Not a hoax it was just a mistake, some guy was walking around and his shadow got into shot and when fans saw it they thought it was a ghost.
There was a movie made around the time of the moon landings called Capricorn One. The main plot of the movie involved a faked moon landing. Many people then obviously accepted that as a possibility for the actual moon landings.
Well none. People may think that it was Apollo 11, but Apollo 11 was a hoax, and so was the rest of the Apollo 'moon landings'.
Sasquatch spotted in the remote mountains of Mission BC
Yes of course it is. However some 'Hoax Believers' think its not and say that they have evidence against it. The Apollo 18 mission was not as "famous" as the previous moon landings. It sometimes happens that the HB (Hoax Believers) found some reliable evidence but NASA can Always turn it down with proof.
None, because the moon landings were a hoax. Source: I was Hollywood production assistant at Paramount Studios in 1969. I was in charge of directing lighting for the TV coverage.