"UFO"s are real, and have been observed from many locations over many years.
"UFO" is the acronym for "Unidentified Flying Object". Thousands of people have seen things
in the sky that they couldn't identify. Therefore, since the observer in each case had no idea
what they were seeing, each one was, by definition, an unidentified flying object, or UFO.
And that's as far as you can go with it. If the question is asking about UFOs as spaceships,
things from outer space, carrying space aliens, abducting humans, there has never been a
shred of credible evidence of any of those things that stood up to serious examination.
they are real i have proof as well so don't say they are not real cause that would be really dumb!
Well, there are real things that appear to be flying that couldn't be identified; that's why they're called UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects). Some are later identified. There has never yet been actual proof that UFOs come from anywhere but earth.
People have reported sightings of UFOs in France, but there is no proof of their existence.
No, but most believers don't need proof.
We don't know. There is no real proof of UFO's, nor aliens. There have been rumors of the government making starships, but again, there are no proof. But in science fiction, the aliens made starships.
It is impossible to even speculate. There is no admitted proof that UFOs do exist and no hard information on propulsion.
There are many videos and photos of flying objects. But what they are remain largly unknown. Are they run by aliens for other planets? There has yet to be definitive proof of that.
No.
There is proof of snow and Bacteria on Mars, but I'm not sure about the UFO's.
yes duhh
No he is not he is the real deal and I am proof. His system actually worked.
No. "Proof by a preponderance of the evidence" (meaning: my argument can beat up your argument) is the standard for most civil trials. "Proof beyond a resonable doubt" (meaning: unless UFOs are real we gotcha) is the standard for most criminal trials.