Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies a weakness in a believer.
None do. By definition, superstitious beliefs do not have a scientific basis.
Superstitions do not have any scientific proof. It is purely based on individual beliefs.
The lack of a scientific basis is one of the DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS of a superstition. If there is a scientific basis for something, it would no longer be fair to call it a superstition.
Do superstition about comets and asteriods have scientific basis. "Why or why not"
No. The term "superstition" refers, precisely, to unscientific beliefs - often about supposed cause and effect, when there is no good reason to assume that one thing causes another.
No. By definition, a superstition is a belief that does not have a scientific basis.
i believe in superstition because it helps us to be learn more but i think with scientific basis......
"Having no scientific basis" is pretty much the definition of "superstition". That's why.
A superstition is any belief that is followed based on tradition and empirical evidence rather than a belief that is based on scientific testing, logic and reason: Any belief that relies on the existence of something supernatural for an explanation, it is a superstition.
A superstition is any belief that is followed based on tradition and empirical evidence rather than a belief that is based on scientific testing, logic and reason: Any belief that relies on the existence of something supernatural for an explanation, it is a superstition.
In other countries what are the examples of superstition with scientific basis
The scientific method differs from superstition, guessing, intuition, and hope in that it relies on systematic observation, experimentation, and evidence to draw conclusions. While superstition and intuition may offer explanations based on personal beliefs or feelings, they lack empirical support and repeatability. In contrast, the scientific method emphasizes testing hypotheses and revising theories based on observable data, fostering a more reliable understanding of the natural world. Ultimately, the scientific method seeks objective truth, while superstition and intuition often reflect subjective interpretations or desires.