The idea about belief is that they don't need a scientific explaination, so pretty much every belief and practice do not have real scientific explaination. The closest thing to a scientific explaination I have is that a certain type of energy is there and it can be controlled by humans; but there is little evidence to prove this.
superrtitious beliefs about comets and its scientific explanation
we are the future of the world
Science is distinguished from non-scientific beliefs and practices by its reliance on evidence, experimentation, and the scientific method to test and validate hypotheses.
Yes, this describes pseudoscience, which consists of beliefs and practices that lack empirical support and scientific validation. Such systems often employ scientific-sounding language but fail to adhere to the scientific method or rigorous testing. They can mislead individuals by providing unfounded explanations for behavior, which may lead to ineffective or harmful consequences.
wew
Mostly that would be religion and politics.
well the superstitions are vague and astronomically impossible there for no means to scientfic aggriculture this means rugulation paresedication lf the recept day there for cupption and sattisification disisgrafied.
Mostly that would be religion and politics.
paullette gorgeous ^_^
There are none. If a belief or practice is superstitious, then by defintion it does not have a scientific basis.
Practices and beliefs with a scientific basis:Washing hands after using the bathroom and before eating to get rid of germs.The use of chemical fertilizers to improve crop yields.The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.
Pseudoscience refers to beliefs or practices that claim to be scientific but lack empirical evidence, are not backed by the scientific community, and often rely on unfounded assumptions or faulty reasoning. Examples include astrology, homeopathy, and creationism.