Purple
that sort of infomation is not on record sorry xx
that sort of infomation is not on record unfortunetly. xx
There have been very few pictures of what some think is the mythical Loch Ness monster, and they have been very grainy at best. No one has ever proven that it exists, so, therefore, it is impossible to determine the sex. However, most people refer to it as female.
Most scientists don't believe that there is any monster in Loch Ness but those people who do believe in 'Nessie' generally seem to think that it is some sort of aquatic dinosaur but if that is so what it is doing in Loch Ness, which was buried under ice during the last Ice Age, or how it got there, nobody has even been able to satisfactoraliy explain.
Sort of looks like Harrison Lake, BC.
yes sort of It is connected at the southern end by the River Oich and a section of the Caledonian Canal to Loch Oich. At the northern end there is the Bona Narrows which opens out into Loch Dochfour, which feeds the River Ness and a further section of canal to Inverness. It is one of a series of interconnected, murky bodies of water in Scotland; its water visibility is exceptionally low due to a high peat content in the surrounding soil. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch_Ness
It has a brown body with 4 flippers. Has a dragon like head. There is allot of evidence to prove that the Loch Ness Monster does really exist.Alternative answer: There is absolutely no scientific evidence to prove that a 'monster' exists in Loch Ness. Many people believe that the 'monster' story was simply dreamed up to atract tourists, if this is true it has certainly worked. Those who believe in the 'monster' seem to think it is some sort of marine dinosaur yet seem unable to explain what a creature that has been believed extinct for tens of millions of years is doing in a Scottish loch which was buried under a kilometre or more of ice during the last Ice Age, only ten thousand years ago.
Like many myths there is no real evidence than there is any sort of 'monster' living in Loch Ness. But, until it is proved absolutely conclusively that there isn't a monster, some people will continue to believe that there is one. The real reason is that people want a little mystery in their lives, they feel that the world is too small, that almost everything has been discovered, labelled and photographed. The Loch Ness monster, Yeti, Sasquatch, Werewolves and Vampire etc offer an escape from what some people view as the mundane boredom of everyday existence. Such creatures offer a promise that there are still things that haven't been explained by science. Cynical peole would say that the Loch Ness monster was just invented as a story, by local people, to attract tourists, and if that is the case it has worked. Most of those who believe in 'Nessie' think that the Loch Ness monster is some sort of marine dinosaur. The Dinosaurs became extinct tens of millions of years ago but only 11 thousand years ago, during the last Ice Age, Loch Ness was buried under a kilometre or more of ice. That was only the most recent of many Ice Ages which have occurred since the extinction of the dinosaurs. So the Loch Ness monster could only have moved to Loch Ness in the last 10 thousand years or so. Where did it come from? Scientists would say that no dinosaur could live for millions of years by itself. Nessie must therefore be a member of an undiscovered species, so where are the rest of them? Why has no one ever been able to prove that they even exist?
Most scientists don't believe that there is any monster in Loch Ness but those people who do believe in 'Nessie' generally seem to think that it is some sort of aquatic dinosaur but if that is so what it is doing in Loch Ness, which was buried under ice during the last Ice Age, or how it got there, nobody has even been able to satisfactoraliy explain.
I think she might have been born there maybe by another dinosaur. That's probably the best answer. ++ No evidence worth its name has ever been produced to suggest there genuinely are any large, unusual animals living in Loch Ness - there would have to be a sizeable colony of them. ' "...born there by another dinosaur"? Well, yes, as I say if it exists it would be one of a colony! And the dinosaurs and their marine equivalents such as the plesiosaur (the creature the "monster" is said to resemble) all died in or before the mass-extinction 65 million years ago. ' Even fairly recent, systematic photographic and sonar searches have failed to find anything. The heading photo is the best known but I think this is the one later proven to be a decaying tree-stump - note that there is nothing in the image to give the object any scale, and the image is quite indistinct.
I think it is a whale of some sort or itis an other mystical creature like the lochness monster. I think the thing will mate with the lochness monster though. It couldn't be the Loch Ness Monster because I have 3 of em from the expedition. So it's not him. It is totally not an other mystical creature or bla bla bla. Even though I didn't unlocked the crate, my friend said that inside was a Beluga whale.
Its a scary sort of monster!