nothing, they just wouldn't have mountains
mountains will grow out of it..... ot it can die.
Without mountains, the Earth's topography would be much flatter and lower in elevation overall. This would impact weather patterns, biodiversity, and the availability of different ecological niches for various species. Additionally, the absence of mountains would likely alter ocean currents and the distribution of resources on the planet.
Hakkōda Mountains incident happened in 1902.
If mountains were to be destroyed, it would have significant environmental and geological impacts. It could lead to increased risk of landslides, loss of biodiversity, disruption of natural habitats, altered weather patterns, and potential threats to communities that rely on mountains for resources such as water and tourism.
Battle of the Florida Mountains happened in 1861-08.
Not too much as humans are able to easily cross mountains. Other species would be affected as allopatric speciation would lose one of it's more powerful geographic separators.
your snomobile would probably ron out of gas before you got across the mountains
-no mountains -Pangaea may still exist -no individual cultures -no earthquakes -no volcano's -no life
they over lap and cause mountains and hills Folded mountains are produced
Geographic features can be described as mountains, rivers, lakes, trenches, etc. Without these there would be alterations in temperature, as well as the rotation of the Earth. Ethnic groups at war would not have mountains to form boundaries and there would be no water on Earth. There would only be snow in the far north and far south and the equator would be scorching hot.
Without continuous mountain formation, erosion would gradually wear down existing mountains to create flatter landscapes. Eventually, the continents would become more level over time, with mountains turning into hills and plains.