All one can say is that the production of CO2 from fossil fuels can only be stopped by ceasing to use fossil fuels. Banning is not the same as ceasing by the way, as illegal use would continue. Man made CO2 emissions would still exist from biomass burning and clearance/burning of forests.
There may be more than one cause of global warming. I always think to myself that we shall probaby know the answers in 100 years from now, but in the meantime it seems sensible to try to reduce emissions, without crippling industry and destroying our way of life. I wouldn't want to go back to a peasant style of life, growing all you need on your own little patch, never having goods from other countries and never travelling abroad, but some of the hard green fraternity seem to advocate that.
The process of global warming can only be ended by reducing the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Unfortunately, there is generally beleved to be a certain point after which nothing we can do will end the effect, and the longer we wait, the more difficult and costly it will be to end the trend. The amount of greenhouse gases being emitted into the atmosphere must be curbed, and the destruction of the planet's photosynthesis engine (the forests) must be stopped and reversed. Without meeting both conditions, the trend of global warming will continue. Global Warming may end on its own, as the global environment becomes inhospitable to people and most of our cities and fossil fuel-guzzling vehicles are destroyed, but these sorts of trends are not really within our ability to accurately predict.
because of global warming. the atmosphere is being destroyed. thus the Sun's rays are melting the ice. the ice at the poles is what keeps the planet from overheating. without it we will all cook.
without global warming you cant live because without it you wouldn't have enough heat kept in the earth. he earth would be cold... but with greenhouse layers there's too much heat kept in or protected .. so this melts icecap's. etc.
No, wave power does not contribute to global warming because it generates electricity without producing greenhouse gas emissions. It is a renewable energy source that utilizes the kinetic energy of ocean waves to generate clean electricity.
No, but global warming is predicted to cause floods and may already have contributed to some of the recent record floods. Global warming is also predicted to cause prolonged droughts in other regions.
Well, nobody really knows what the future would be like. I predict, thought, that we would have to slowly rebuild our world, maybe without cars and greenhouse gas emissions.
Yes. And also with it.
Global warming would slow.People would improve renewable energy so that the whole world has free, non-polluting power. With renewable electricity you can use as much as you like without worry.
Global warming would slow.People would improve renewable energy so that the whole world has free, non-polluting power. With renewable electricity you can use as much as you like without worry.
crocodlles do not die without the sun they do need it but not all the time
Yes, you can live without your eyes if the bleeding is stopped in time.
yes I totally did it yesterday!!
It is difficult to determine an exact temperature without global warming, as natural climate variability would still exist. However, scientists estimate that without human-induced global warming, average temperatures would likely be lower than they are today.
Yes, you can refrigerate milk after warming it without affecting its quality or safety. It is safe to do so as long as the milk is stored properly in a sealed container and promptly refrigerated after heating.
Such a vehicle is said to be parked.
No.
Only the neocash.But without that,its totally Free!