0
How do scientists support the concept of plate movement through evidence and research?
Scientists support the concept of plate movement through evidence and research by studying seismic activity, mapping the ocean floor, analyzing rock formations, and observing the distribution of fossils and plant remains across continents. These methods provide data that support the theory of plate tectonics, which explains how the Earth's lithosphere is divided into large, moving plates that interact at plate boundaries.
What else can I help you with?
What do scientists now know about earth that would have answered the scientists who rejected wegeners theory?
Scientists now know about plate tectonics, which explains how Earth's outer shell is divided into large plates that move and interact with each other. This understanding supports Wegener's theory of continental drift, as it provides a mechanism for the movement of continents over time. Additionally, evidence from ocean floor mapping, seafloor spreading, and magnetic striping further supports the concept of plate tectonics.
What discovery caused scientists to rethink wegeners continental drift theory?
The discovery of mid-ocean ridges and the process of seafloor spreading in the 1960s caused scientists to rethink Wegener's theory of continental drift. This new evidence provided a mechanism for how continents could move apart and lent support to the concept of plate tectonics as the driving force behind the movement of Earth's lithospheric plates.
Why did most scientists not believe in Pangaea?
Because the earth was thought to be made by god, and it was perfect and no continental crusts. The existence of continental crusts is one of the many evidence that proved Pangaea to be a theory. Also, the existence of the fossil records of the same species along the coastlines of 2 different places confirms Pangea. The current movements in earth's crust also provide evidence that Pangaea could have formed. Most scientists were not given this data and therefore the evidence for Pangaea was vague. Only now has the evidence shown more consistency. Science is skeptical my friend.
Where does the evidence to support the concept that the inner core is solid and the outer core is liquid come from?
The evidence that the inner core is solid and the outer core is liquid comes from studying seismic waves and their behavior as they pass through the Earth's layers. By analyzing the travel times and behavior of shear waves and compressional waves, scientists have been able to deduce the differing states of these regions based on how the waves travel through them. Additionally, experiments simulating high pressures and temperatures similar to those found in the Earth's core also provide supporting evidence for this concept.
How do professionals in the field of science or science fiction discursively construct the concept of climate change?
Professionals in the field of science or science fiction construct the concept of climate change through discussions and narratives that analyze data, research, and potential future scenarios related to the Earth's changing climate. They use evidence-based arguments and storytelling techniques to convey the urgency and impact of climate change on the planet and its inhabitants.
Is the bubble theory in the universe accepted by scientists?
The concept of a "bubble universe" is a speculative idea proposed in certain theories such as the multiverse hypothesis, which suggests the existence of multiple universes with different physical laws. While some scientists find the concept intriguing, it remains highly theoretical and lacks empirical evidence to support it. The idea is still a topic of ongoing research and debate among physicists and cosmologists.
Do scientists have proof that mermaids exist?
No, scientists have not found any evidence or proof that mermaids exist. The concept of mermaids is largely based on folklore and mythology, rather than scientific observation or documentation.
Can esp actually be tested?
ESP, or extrasensory perception, is a controversial concept that lacks empirical evidence in scientific research. Various studies attempting to test ESP have produced mixed results and have not been able to conclusively prove its existence. As a result, ESP is considered by many scientists to be a pseudoscience.
What do scientists now know about earth that would have answered the scientists who rejected wegeners theory?
Scientists now know about plate tectonics, which explains how Earth's outer shell is divided into large plates that move and interact with each other. This understanding supports Wegener's theory of continental drift, as it provides a mechanism for the movement of continents over time. Additionally, evidence from ocean floor mapping, seafloor spreading, and magnetic striping further supports the concept of plate tectonics.
What discovery caused scientists to rethink wegeners continental drift theory?
The discovery of mid-ocean ridges and the process of seafloor spreading in the 1960s caused scientists to rethink Wegener's theory of continental drift. This new evidence provided a mechanism for how continents could move apart and lent support to the concept of plate tectonics as the driving force behind the movement of Earth's lithospheric plates.
Why are vestigial proof of evolution?
Evidence, not proof. Scientists do not prove things. Your coccyx for one bit of evidence, This is the " stump " of a vestigial tail that is now used for another purpose in humans; to help with sitting. Sometimes this tail does grow out in child development. This is evidence of the concept of evolutionary common ancestry.
What is a schematic diagram on research?
concept on how the research is to be studied
Is there any evidence to support the existence of cosmic child abuse in the universe?
There is no scientific evidence to support the concept of cosmic child abuse in the universe. This idea is typically found in philosophical or speculative discussions rather than in empirical research.
What is the current scientific understanding of the properties and potential applications of the anti graviton particle?
As of now, there is no scientific evidence or consensus on the existence of the anti-graviton particle. The concept of anti-graviton is largely theoretical and speculative in the field of theoretical physics. Scientists are still exploring the properties and potential applications of such a particle, but it remains a topic of ongoing research and debate.
Have scientists found the opening to heaven?
No, scientists have not found any conclusive evidence or scientific basis for the existence of an opening to heaven. The concept of heaven is primarily rooted in religious and cultural beliefs rather than scientific investigation.
Which scientists was responsible for establishing the concept of a quantum?
planck
What do scientists who do pure research do?
Pure research scientists are not primarily concerned with practical applications for their experiments. They may be testing previously unmeasured materials (cohesive molecules, superconductors) or experimentally proving or disproving mathematical conjectures (gravity waves).
