0
To avoid bias about global warming, it's important to rely on credible sources of information, consider multiple perspectives, and critically evaluate the evidence. Being open-minded, staying informed about scientific research and findings, and being willing to update your beliefs based on new information can help reduce bias.
What else can I help you with?
Is there any proof that global warming is fake?
There is no proof that global warming is not happening. After the recent record global average temperature of 1998, there was a lull, with subsequent years recording lower average temperatures, but this is to be expected as part of normal climate fluctuations. Some optimists nevertheless saw that as proof that global warming had stopped, or even reversed. However, the year 2005 matched the average global temperature of 1998, then 2010 actually exceeded that temperature by a fraction of a degree. There is therefore no proof that global warming is not happening.A:Many people think the the Earth is going through "global warming". Is it fact or just a therory? Well, from what I have learned (from my theacher and his long speaches) that "global warming" is fake. The Earth goes through a cylcle of changing weather. One day it may be cold. Then the next it's hot. The Earth's weather is just like that. Antarctica (the place of the so called "global warming") has been frozen, and frozen very well. In fact it's been frozen forever. The temperature there on about August 20th was at about -10 degrees. That's pretty cold! If you have internet on your Wii go to the weather channel and you can look at the globe to see places weather daily. That's just a little something you can do. In a nut shell, the Earth is not going through "global warming".Also, Antarctica has actually cooled. Dr. Peter Norman and his colleagues have found out that since 1986 Antarctica has been cooling an average of 1.2 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. Also, the earth is coller now than it was 1000 years ago. In which was known as the Medieval Warming Period the temperature was warmer than it was in the 1990s and the Medieval Warming Period was before the industrial revolution and the emission of greenhouse gases.If we are to assume, as we have been instructed to do so, that global warming refers to the main induced portion of the current warming cycle, we have some interesting data.The planet appears to have cooled this past year.Sea level has not increased as predicted and has actually been slower presently than past decades.Sea level has even gone down 6 mm this past year.The bulk of the planets warming happened before 1939. we are only a few tenths of a degree (plus or minus a few tenths) away from the temperatures of 1938The Antarctic has not seen overall ice loss.CO2 has always followed temperature.Despite massive increases in the use of fossil fuels, we saw global cooing from 1939 until 1979. The years 1939, 1998 and 2010 are almost identical, with cooling between those years.IPCC models have not been able to reproduce current warming and cooing trends.The IPCC admits in their policymakers paper that the interaction of water vapor (the predominant greenhouse gas) is still not fully understood.UAH Satellite documentation shows cooling of lower troposphere to 0.09 degrees below the 1981 average for that layer of atmosphere.AnswerWhat do you mean? Global warming exists. It's reality.AnswerEven prior to the current cooling, between 1975 and 1998, when global average annual temperatures were supposedly going up, there is now considerable reason to doubt that they were reallygoing up. See the link below to surfacestations.org. It appears that 87% of the temperature-recording stations in the US alone are located within 30 meters of an artificial heat source, which biases temperatures upward by at least 1oC. By my own calculations, the US's portion of the "official temperature record" has an average bias of slightly more than 3oC. Since the US makes up 9% of the land area on the planet, even if the rest of the world's temperature recording stations are completely unbiased (not likely), the bias in the US alone accounts for 0.27oC, or nearly half of the 0.6oC increase in global average annual temperature observed over the last 40 years. But it is more likely that, at least in Canada, Europe, and China, the observations are subject to some degree of positive bias. It would not surprise me at all if, once all of these biases were quantified, the actualtemperature has not gone up at all over the last 40 years, and may have gone down.In any event, the analysis by surfacestations.org proves that actual temperatures have not gone up nearly as rapidly as the 0.15oC per decade claimed. This is a crucial point because alarmists have finally been forced to admit not only that global warming occurred in the past, in a regular, 1,000-year cycle (the last three episodes are now called the Minoan, Roman, and Medieval Warm Periods), but that the peak temperatures during all three of these past events exceeded the highest temperatures achieved during the "current" warm period. So now they have fallen back on the claim that the "current" warming is unique because of how rapidly temperatures have been rising, continually pointing to that 0.15oC per decade statistic. But that statistic is now proven to be positively biased, and the actual rate of warming, even if the only the US's temperatures are biased, is only about 0.08oC per decade. This puts it below the rate of warming of all three of the previous warm periods. So once again we are left with the unavoidable conclusion that the current warming is not unusual at all. Answer The El Nino of 1997-1998 was the strongest on record, and is one of the major (but not only) reasons for the record heat. The temperature has not been going down since 1998 - it has remained high, and in fact the hottest decade in recorded history followed. But no, none of those years were as hot as 1998. Obviously, since then the SOI has oscillated as it always does and there have been multiple La Ninas and El Ninos since; I'm not sure what one would derive from that in terms of denialist arguments.The record of temperatures is far more robust than volunteer United States stations. The warming has been verified at all levels of the troposphere, in ocean temperatures and in innumerable proxy records. This issue has been addressed.Temperatures declined prior to the 1970's slightly due to the large amount of aerosols that were being pumped into the atmosphere by countries such as the United States; aerosols have a net cooling affect. We are now seeing the same thing in India and China, and this is even evidenced in temperature trends that have leveled off or slightly declined in that region.Furthermore, temperatures now are warmer than they were during the Medieval Warm Period or the prior two (and there is really far too much uncertainty for temperatures going back this far). This statement otherwise was popularized by Ray Evans, who cites a figure taken from a paper (Grootes et al. 1993) which simply is not there, it does not exist. The figure, that is, not the paper.And since the current warming doesn't fall in line with any natural cycle, real or fictitious, where does that leave us? No, it doesn't leave us with the conclusion that the current warming is anthropogenic. That would be lazy and dishonest science. We have come to that conclusion for many, many reasons. We know what the radiative properties of CO2 are from studies done in the 19th century; this is solid. We know how much CO2 and other greenhouse gases we have liberated into the atmosphere since the industrial revolution. We have observed the rise in temperature, accounted for error and uncertainty, and have been doing this since before Al Gore ever noticed it was getting hotter. Climate models can do a remarkably good job of recreating the observed temperature, but they can only do it with an input of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. Without them, they show a slight cooling, which deviates markedly from the trend of the last several decades.Answer The current decade MAY be the hottest on record. All that proves is that we hit the maximum during the current decade. Even after adjusting for El Ninos and other fluctuations, the 5-year average of global average temperatures has definitely turned downward. Is this just a bigger fluctuation? Or is it a sign of things to come? Nobody knows yet.Temperature is what global warming is all about. Proxy data are just estimates of actual temperatures, and there are many sources of error in these estimates. For that matter, as illustrated by Anthony Watts, recorded temperatures are only estimates of actual temperatures, and they are particularly bad estimates in some cases, with confirmed positive bias of over 5 degrees C in some cases. What global warming theory says is that, if global warming is caused by greenhouse gasses, there will be more warming in the upper troposphere than at the surface. The observational data, by satellites, shows exactly the opposite. So, even if the upper troposphere really is warming, it's warming more slowly than the surface. This clearly points to a cause other than greenhouse gasses.AnswerIt does exist. Evidence supporting its existence is extensive. For one, based on geological data and evidence, the Earth is supposed to be in a period of cooling, but instead our temperatures have risen 0.74ºC (from 1906-2006). Our temperatures have only continued to rise, and are projected to rise anywhere between 1.8 to 4.6ºC in the next 100 years. This is an exponential increase, as from the time of the last ice age to now, the Earth's mean surface temperature only increased 3.5ºC.Our rising sea levels indicate global warming, not merely due to melting ice caps, but also because when water warms, the molecules expand.A more accurate term than global warming is global climate change, as not all areas will warm, and climate change will not be uniform.People who say global climate change/warming does not exist do not have concrete scientific facts to dismantle the basic facts: that greenhouse gases are increasing, and are directly correlated with the raise in the temperature in many places of the world.AnswerWe were warming over the last couple of centuries, and the warming now appears to have stopped.I do not dispute that atmospheric carbon dioxide is increasing. Nor do I dispute that temperatures were increasing from around 1975 to around 2000, and that there is, therefore, some degree of correlation between atmospheric CO2 and global average temperature. However, correlation does not prove causation. Take a statistics class and you will learn this. Statistics classes are chock full of examples of two things that are highly correlated but cannot possibly have a causal relationship. For example, some statistician found a high correlation between the stork population in a French city and the human birth rate in the same city. He concluded that storks delivered babies. Of course, he was not serious, but was trying to prove the absurdity of equating correlation and causation.
Why is it important to understand the presence of bias?
Understanding the presence of bias is important because it allows us to critically evaluate information and make informed decisions. Bias can influence the way we perceive and interpret information, leading to unfair judgments or decisions. By being aware of bias, we can strive for more objective and just outcomes in various aspects of our lives.
How can a blind study help reduce bias?
A blind study can help reduce bias by preventing the participants or researchers from being influenced by their knowledge of which group they belong to. This can help ensure that the results are more objective and not influenced by preconceived notions or expectations.
The names given to the hurricanes are of which gender?
They alternate in gender, for example in 2010 we had Alex, Bonnie, Colin, Danielle, Earl, and so forth. Prior to 1979 they were given all female names.
What sources is the most likely to contain a problematic bias?
B. The sources creator could personally benefit from convincing people to accept his argument.
Why are you deluded into believing that global warming is a fact and is happening as you speak?
Hmmm... that question poses a bit of a bias. But ultimately as Joe Citizen, I don't know anything, so I have to turn to scientists to investigate and answer these kinds of questions. And 90% of climate scientists agree: global warming is real.
What is used to avoid bias in a bias clinical?
Double-blind testingRandom Assignment
What is an example sentence for the word bias?
You need to avoid bias when you're a teacher.Because of the bias in his study, the results were rejected.
What does a Well-designed research manages to minimize or avoid?
bias
What is multicultural anti-bias?
Not having a bias (a sense of national superiority) over many other cultures.
In a scientific opinion polling a random sample is used to avoid?
bias.
Who started the global warming epidemic and when?
This started in the eighteenth century with the beginning of the Industrial Age, although at first the changes were so slight that scientists were unaware of them. Around the beginning of the twentieth century, Svante Arrhenius calculated that emissions from human industry might someday bring a global warming, but other scientists dismissed his idea as faulty. In 1938, G.S. Callendar stated that the level of carbon dioxide was climbing and raising global temperature, but most scientists found his conclusions implausible - scientists tend to have a bias against novel theories until the evidence is undeniable. It was only in the early 1960s, when C.D. Keeling measured the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and found that it was rising fast that researchers began to take an interest. We now know that average global temperatures are indeed rising, and that global warming is associated with the increased levels of carbon dioxide produced by human activity.
What is used to avoid bias in a clinical trial?
Double-blind testingRandom Assignment
Use the word bias in a sentence?
Your question forces me to bias my answer in your favor. Please attenuate the bias in that circuit. As a noun: To avoid a bias in the results, the survey should include a cross section of age groups. As an adjective: A bias cut fabric will give the garment more flexibility. As an adverb: If you bias cut the wood, it will add more dimension to the piece. As a verb: Revealing the witness' background could bias the testimony for the jury.
How does verification of sources help prevent media bias?
Verification of sources increases credibility of the media and prevents bias. Most news resources require collaboration on breaking news items to avoid jumping the gun based on bias.
Suggest good topics for Senior School level topics for declamation contest?
Suggest good topics for Senior School level topics for declamation contest? good topics for declamations are: Global Warming Gender bias pressures i face in my life a day in 21st century a day in a teens life
How do you remove gender bias?
Description text should avoid the use of his/her or he/she and instead use their, they, you etc.
