0
What else can I help you with?
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
Why do most scientists believe that the climate is changing?
Most scientists believe that the climate is changing due to the overwhelming evidence showing increasing global temperatures, rising sea levels, melting glaciers, and more frequent extreme weather events. These changes are primarily driven by human activities, such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation, which release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and contribute to global warming. Multiple independent studies and scientific assessments support the consensus that human-induced climate change is occurring.
What evidence do scientists use to study the earth?
Scientists use a variety of evidence to study the Earth, including geological formations, fossils, ice core samples, tree rings, sediment layers, and isotopic analysis. These sources help scientists understand the history of the Earth, its climate changes, and the processes that have shaped its landforms over time.
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
The primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth is radiometric dating of rocks and fossils. By measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes within these materials, scientists can estimate their ages and establish a timeline for Earth's history that stretches back billions of years.
Scientists use the magnetic properties of some minerals as evidence of?
Scientists use the magnetic properties of some minerals as evidence of past changes in Earth's magnetic field. These changes can provide insight into the Earth's geological history, including continental drift and past climates.
How do scientists gather evidence that earth is continually changing?
Scientists gather information that earth is continually changing by observing tectonic plate movements and studying how the layers of the crust were formed. This was discovered by J. Tuzo Wilson, who first suggested the idea of continental drift: Earth's land masses in a continually state of motion, another continuing event that evidences constant change, is sea floor spreading: new seabed being created by lava flows along volcanic ridges.
How do scientists gather and interpret data that the earth is continually changing?
Scientists gather information that earth is continually changing by observing tectonic plate movements and studying how the layers of the crust were formed. For example, the continental drift is the idea of the continents that were all together the the years passed and the continents got separate. This idea was first suggested by Alfred Wegener in 1915. He called the single large continent Pangea. Today, there are many kinds of evidence that support continental movement. The evidence include: In 1858: Geologist Eduard Seuss points out that fossils of the Glossopteris plant were found in 5 continents and in India. Also, In 1965: Geologist Edward Bullard uses computers to match coats of South America and Africa. They match extremely well at an ocean depth of 1,000 m.
How do scientists get empirical evidence?
i know that this is stupid but how do scientists get empirical evidence.
What does a forensic sciencetist?
Forensic scientists use scientific methods to collect, analyze, and interpret evidence from crime scenes. They help law enforcement solve crimes by providing expert analysis on various types of evidence, such as DNA, fingerprints, and ballistics. Their work aims to uncover the truth and assist in the prosecution of criminals.
How do forensic scientist examine physical evidence?
Forensic scientists examine physical evidence by employing a variety of techniques tailored to the type of material being analyzed. They begin with careful documentation, including photography and sketches, to preserve the scene and context of the evidence. The evidence is then subjected to various analyses, such as chemical testing, microscopy, or DNA profiling, depending on its nature. Finally, forensic scientists interpret the results within the framework of the investigation, providing insights that can aid in solving crimes or legal matters.
How did scientists and historians differ in their work?
Scientists and historians differ primarily in their methodologies and subject matter. Scientists rely on empirical evidence, experimentation, and the scientific method to formulate hypotheses and draw conclusions about the natural world. In contrast, historians analyze and interpret primary and secondary sources to understand and contextualize past events, focusing on human experiences and societal developments. While both disciplines seek to uncover truths, their approaches to evidence and interpretation vary significantly.
What evidence do you see of the dynatmic nature of our planet?
Evidence of the dynamic nature of our planet includes the movement of tectonic plates, which cause earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Additionally, the changing climate patterns, erosion of landscapes, and shifting ocean currents are all indicators of the dynamic processes that continually shape Earth's surface.
How do scientists collect and interpret data?
Scientists collect data through various methods, including experiments, observations, surveys, and measurements, tailored to their specific research questions. They use tools and technologies to ensure accuracy and reliability, such as sensors, cameras, and software for data analysis. Once collected, scientists interpret the data using statistical methods and analytical techniques to identify patterns, relationships, and trends. This interpretation helps them draw conclusions and make informed decisions based on the evidence gathered.
How did the scientists revolution change the way scientists did their work?
They relied more on evidence.
How do you use empirical evidence in a sentence?
the scientists had empirical evidence waiting to be answered
Where did scientist find evidence about rodinia?
Scientists found evidence in Rodinia in Antartica.
Do scientists had an evidence about the end of th world?
no :)
