0
How does the continental drift hypothesis account for the apparent wandering of the poles?
The magnetic poles do move a bit, but stay mainly near the north and south geographic poles. As the continents move, though, different areas of crust overlay the magnetic poles, and the paleomagnetic markers (such as iron granules) point to where the pole WAS when they were deposited and then solidified into position. These "polar" crustal regions later move and the poles appear to have moved; actually, the crust has moved instead.
For example, the north magnetic pole now is on an arctic island. In 100 milliion years that island may have been moved by plate tectonics to the equator, and the lava deposited in Yellowstone will point to that area.
What else can I help you with?
Compare and contrast apparent magnitude and absolute magnitude?
Apparent magnitude is the brightness of a celestial object as seen from Earth, taking into account distance and extinction from the atmosphere. Absolute magnitude measures the intrinsic brightness of a celestial object if it were placed at a standard distance of 10 parsecs (about 32.6 light-years) away from Earth. In essence, apparent magnitude is how bright an object appears from Earth, while absolute magnitude is how bright it would be at a standardized distance.
Compare apparent magnitude and absolute magnitude?
Apparent magnitude is a measure of how bright a star appears from Earth, taking into account its distance and how much light it emits. Absolute magnitude, on the other hand, is a measure of a star's intrinsic brightness if it were observed from a standard distance of 10 parsecs. It helps in comparing the true brightness of stars regardless of their distance from Earth.
What is difference between apparent brightness and absolute brightness?
Absolute Brightness: How bright a star appears at a certain distance. Apparent Brightness: The brightness of a star as seen from Earth.
What is the continental crust made out of?
continental crust is made of many rocks such as granite
According to this first-hand account what made the troops perform so well in such terrible weather?
The troops were highly motivated due to their belief in the importance of their mission and camaraderie with their fellow soldiers. Their training and preparation had instilled discipline and resilience, enabling them to focus on their objectives despite the challenging conditions. Additionally, effective leadership and support from their commanding officers helped to maintain morale and cohesion within the unit.
How do you find out your wandering horses on Howrse?
Make another account, and friend yourself. Then go to your first account's page, and look for a wandering horse on it. Hope this helped! ps friend me my username is woodycat!
What should you do if your hypothesis is wrong?
Formulate a new hypothesis, taking into account the data from your experiment.
What is the difference between an obseration and a hypothesis?
An Observation is an account of what actually happened whilst a Hypothesis is what you think will happen
How did the opponents of the continental drift hypothesis account for the existence of similar life forms on widely separated land-masses?
Opponents of the continental drift hypothesis suggested that similar life forms on widely separated landmasses could have dispersed through land bridges or islands that have since disappeared. They also proposed the idea of convergent evolution, where similar environments could lead to the evolution of similar species independently.
A statement that attempts to predict or to account for a set of phenomena called?
Hypothesis
A bank I used to do business with just updated an old account for no apparent reason which has lowered my credit score what can I do about this?
Was the account closed?
What does this account by an army surgeon at valley forge reveal about the continental army?
the continental army is because sickness was spreading around.
Why do you think wegener held to his hypothesis even though he could not prove it?
Wegener held to his hypothesis of continental drift because he believed the evidence he had gathered—such as the matching geological features, fossil distributions, and the fit of continental coastlines—strongly suggested a historical connection between continents. His conviction was further fueled by the lack of an alternative explanation that could adequately account for these observations. Additionally, Wegener was ahead of his time, and he recognized that scientific understanding evolves; he trusted that future research would eventually provide the necessary evidence to support his ideas.
How did opponents of the continental drift hypothesis account for the existence of similar life forms on separated landmasses?
Opponents of the continental drift hypothesis attributed the presence of similar life forms on separated landmasses to independent evolution and convergent evolution, where similar environmental conditions led to analogous adaptations in different species. They also proposed the possibility of land bridges or migration routes that allowed species to disperse across oceans before the continents drifted apart. Additionally, some suggested that ancient organisms could have been carried by ocean currents or through other means, leading to a distribution that appeared to support the idea of continental drift.
What is apparent relative density?
Apparent relative density is a measure of the density of a material compared to the density of another reference material, typically water. It is calculated by dividing the apparent mass of the material by the mass of an equal volume of the reference material. Apparent relative density does not take into account the presence of any voids or pores in the material.
What is reformulated hypothesis?
A reformulated hypothesis is a revised version of the original hypothesis that takes into account new information, data, or insights obtained during the course of an experiment or study. It reflects any adjustments made to the initial research question or prediction based on results and observations.
What are some weaknesses of the hypothesis?
Some weaknesses of a hypothesis include its lack of empirical support, which can undermine its validity. Additionally, if the hypothesis is too broad or vague, it may be difficult to test or falsify. It might also rely on assumptions that are not substantiated, leading to potential biases in interpretation. Finally, a hypothesis that does not account for confounding variables can result in misleading conclusions.
