0
The gravitational field due to the stone is much weaker than that due to Earth because of the difference in mass between the two objects. The strength of the gravitational field depends on the mass of the object creating it, so Earth's gravitational field is much stronger due to its significantly larger mass compared to the stone.
What else can I help you with?
What does the prefix litho mean?
The prefix "litho" means "stone" or "rock," and it is commonly used in words related to rocks, stones, or the lithosphere, which is the rigid outer layer of Earth.
How far is it from the earth to reach outside of the earth's atmosphere?
According to Newtonian mechanics, gravitational fields are infinite in extent, so in fact you could never get away at all. Gravitational field strength is given by: g = MG/r2 Only if r (the distance) is infinite can the field strength equal zero. Surprisingly though, it is possible to have a finite speedwhich is sufficient to keep moving away from earth - in theory - forever, to an unlimited distance. This is the escape velocity. By calculus, one can prove that the amount of kinetic energy required to move an infinite distance from the earth (from an initial distance r) is: 1/2mv2 = mMG/r and hence v = sqrt(2MG/r) [N.B. 'M' is the mass of the earth, 'm' the mass of the object subject to Earth's gravitational pull, and 'G' the gravitational constant.] Even so, you would need eternity to travel an infinite distance.
What does the term lithic refer to?
The term "lithic" generally refers to objects or materials that are related to stone. It can be used to describe stone tools, artifacts, or cultures that primarily used stone in their technology.
What do you call a stone entering earth's atmosphere?
A stone entering Earth's atmosphere is called a meteoroid. As it travels through the atmosphere and begins to burn up due to friction and heat, it is then called a meteor or shooting star. If any portion of the meteoroid reaches the Earth's surface, it is known as a meteorite.
How many people on earth are named stone?
There is no exact number of people named Stone on earth, but it is a relatively uncommon first name. It is estimated that there are fewer than 10,000 people with the first name Stone in the United States.
Regarding the gravitational interaction between the Earth and a stone is the Earth within the stone's gravitational field and how is it related to the Earth's gravitational field?
The Earth would lie within the gravitational field of the stone. For any form of gravitational interaction to occur between two objects, they must lie within each other's gravitational field. The gravitational field of the stone would not be affected by the Earth in any way, because the gravitational field is only a measure of the gravitational force that one object exerts on another, which varies only with mass. The gravitational force of the stone on the earth and the earth on the stone is given by the following formula:Mass[stone] * Mass[earth] * universal constant / distance between them squared. Specifications Talking about fields is not so simple. First of all, if there are two or more bodies (here, Earth and stone) the gravitation field is still one: it's due to the mass of the Earth and the mass of the stone, and it's different from the field that would be generated only by the Earth or only by the stone. So: there is only one field, generated by both the masses, and both the masses feel it and their motions are consequently modified by it. What makes this a problem is the fact that bodies generate the field (according to their mass and position) and the field modifies the position of the bodies themselves: so the field keeps changing in time! In fact, we usually assume that the field is generated by a fixed "mass distribution" (here, the Earth) and acts on a body whose mass is too small to considerably modify the field (here, the stone): in this way, we have an unchanging field and a body feeling it. Anyway, formally, the total gravitation field is ginven by the sum of the field of the Earth and the field of the stone, for each point of space (r being the position):g(r, t) = gE(t) + gS(t) == - GmE (r - rE(t))/|r - rE(t)|3 - GmS (r - rS(t))/|r - rS(t)|3.As you can see, (1) the dipendence of g from time is due to rE(t) and rS(t) (that change according to gacting on mE and mS themselves), and (2) one cannot apply this equation to r = rS or r = rE (that is, one cannot apply this equation to study the field acting on mE or mS), since for these r the field g diverges.
Consider a stone at rest on the ground There are two interactions that involve the stone One is between the stone and the earth?
Yes. One interaction is between the rock and the earth. The other interaction is between the rock and the sun. The two opposing gravitational forces are both interacting with the rock.
Would you need the same force to keep the stone moving as you did to get it started?
This depends upon where the stone is.In a vacuum with no gravitational fields nearby you would need no additional energy to keep a stone flying, the first throw would do it and it would continue until another force acted upon it.To keep a stone moving on the Moon you will need to keep putting in sufficient energy to overcome the gravity there.To keep a stone moving on Earth you would have to keep putting sufficient energy in to overcome a higher gravitational field and the drag caused by the atmosphere.
Why do you neglect gravitational forces exerted on a falling stone by nearby trees while calculating its acceleration?
Mainly because those forces are so much much much much tinier than the gravitational forces between the stone and the Earth. But if you want to be technically precise about it, it's also because any other thing besides the Earth creates a gravitational force on the stone that's not vertical, so it has even less effect on the vertical acceleration than it might otherwise have, even with its pathetically almost negligible mass.
Why do you weigh more on Mt Everest?
Mt. Everest is made of stone which is really dense so the earth has more mass in that area. The more massive an object is, the more gravitational force it exerts. Your weight is the force with which the earth pulls on you.
Why does the weight of a stone is less at the top of a mountain than at its bottom?
The weight of a stone at the top of a mountain is less than at its bottom because the gravitational force decreases with distance from the center of the Earth. Therefore, at higher altitudes, the force of gravity pulling the stone towards the center of the Earth is slightly weaker, resulting in a lower weight reading on a scale.
Which has more gravitational potential energy a 50-kg stone or a 70-kg stone?
The gravitational potential energy is dependent on the mass and height of the object. Assuming both stones are at the same height, the 70-kg stone would have more gravitational potential energy due to its greater mass.
Why does a 70-kg stone have more gravitational potential energy than a 50-kg stone?
The gravitational potential energy of an object depends on its height above the reference point and its mass. Since both stones are at the same height, the stone with a higher mass (70 kg) will have more gravitational potential energy than the stone with a lower mass (50 kg) because it requires more work to lift the heavier stone to that height.
When was Would You Lay with Me - In a Field of Stone - created?
Would You Lay with Me - In a Field of Stone - was created in 1974.
What does the prefix litho mean?
The prefix "litho" means "stone" or "rock," and it is commonly used in words related to rocks, stones, or the lithosphere, which is the rigid outer layer of Earth.
What would happen if you dropped a stone on the moon?
If you dropped a stone on the moon, it would fall towards the surface due to the moon's gravity. However, since the moon has a weaker gravitational pull than Earth, the stone would fall more slowly than it would on Earth. Additionally, the lack of atmosphere on the moon means there is no air resistance to slow down the stone's descent.
What is an example of gravitational potential energy tranforming in kinetic energy?
A falling stone.
