alot of money
All cost/benefit is driven by the specifics of the situation. In this case terms like "all pollution" and "regardless of cost" would make the question unanswerable. Like the control of toxins in workplace environments there is a "no impact level" for pollutants. Below this limit the natural assimilative capacity of the system can remove the material. Risk analysis is based on the fact that zero is risk is never attainable. With regard to the cost factors - pollution control systems themselves have a calculable cost - the added worth of supporting a population through wages, infrastructure through taxes and health care through employee benefits which offset the acceptance of a level of pollution are more difficult to peg. These would come into play in calculating "regardless of cost". In the example of the use of fertilizers and pesticides in the agribusiness, the total elimination of these potential pollutants could cause massive food shortages and starvation - not a cost that people would be willing to pay.
There are various types of pollution, including air pollution, water pollution, soil pollution, noise pollution, and light pollution. Each type of pollution has different sources and impacts on the environment and human health.
Any level of pollution that harms human health, the environment, or disrupts ecosystems is considered too much. It is important to keep pollution levels as low as possible through effective policies and practices to protect our planet and all living organisms.
Air pollution can lead to serious health issues such as respiratory problems, cardiovascular diseases, and even cancer. It can also harm the environment by contributing to climate change, damaging ecosystems, and reducing air quality. Addressing air pollution is crucial for protecting human health and the planet.
It is difficult to determine an exact number of whales that die from pollution each year. Pollution can cause harm to whales through ingestion of plastic, entanglement in debris, and exposure to toxic chemicals. Conservation efforts are focused on reducing pollution to protect whale populations.
About cost 50 dollars which was a good deal!
$450 is a good deal it cost me $480, hope this helps.
They cost from about 6 to 10 dollars, not a big deal.
.20
I do not know exactly but probably not much because of all the pollution.
Like the question "How long is apiece of string?" there is no answer for all gases. Pollution abatement at the source can involve the installation of millions of dollars with of treatment equipment or it can actually be profitable if the treatment recovers a waste stream that can be reused, resold or otherwise consumed. Similarly pollution which has escaped to the environment can cost millions or billions of dollars to clean up like the leaking oil platform in the Gulf or Mexico or be almost free if natural effects destroy the pollution by simply stopping the addition of fresh pollutants to the area.
Air pollution doesn't have a "cost." But it does cause Global Warming and the atmosphere getting "clogged up" so to speak.
How much do you have? I may be able to make you a deal.
by stopping pollution
From Anchorage's air quality you can get the best deal for air pollution mask in Anchorage, AK
It cost 96+ million dollars to clean up the San Diego Bay Front
Pugs cost $400-$1200 dollars :)