False.
It is warmer underground than on the surface because the Earth's inner core is much hotter than the surface. The temperature increases the deeper you go beneath the Earth's surface due to the geothermal heat coming from the Earth's interior.
If Earth's interior had the same composition as the crust, the planet would be cooler and less dynamic. This would result in reduced geological activity such as volcanoes, earthquakes, and plate tectonics. The lack of differentiation in the layers would also impact the magnetic field and the generation of Earth's protective atmosphere.
If Earth's oceans were much smaller, the climate would likely be more extreme due to reduced heat absorption and distribution. The smaller oceans would also affect weather patterns, leading to drier and more unstable conditions in many regions. Overall, the impact on Earth's climate would be significant and difficult to predict accurately.
The greenhouse effect is called that becouse the earth naturally acts like a greenhouse but with the gases (like CO2) going up into the air, the barrier around the earth that acts like a greenhouse, makes the barrier stronger and that makes the earth get more warmer. So...The more greenhouse gases we produce the warmer the earths temperture would be
If air was to retain the heat from the sun during saylight hours then the earth would stay warmer for longer, however air is constantly moving so we get air from different parts of the world. so if it is cold near to the UK while they have sunlight and we have night time then we are more likely to be cold so even if air was a better heat conductor we would not be warmer during the night.
It is warmer underground than on the surface because the Earth's inner core is much hotter than the surface. The temperature increases the deeper you go beneath the Earth's surface due to the geothermal heat coming from the Earth's interior.
When the Earth was smaller, its interior would have been cooler due to the limited amount of radioactive decay and heat generation from the formation process. A smaller planet would have experienced less gravitational compression, leading to lower pressure and reduced geothermal activity. Additionally, the surface area-to-volume ratio would have been higher, allowing heat to escape more efficiently. As the planet grew larger, it accumulated more heat from both internal processes and external impacts, leading to a hotter interior.
Warmer
If the earth were tilted at a greater angle, the Arctic and Antarctic would be warmer in summer and colder in winter than they are now, as they would get more direct sunshine in summer. If the tilt were smaller then the Polar regions would be colder than they are now. Canada and Russia would be colder. Equatorial regions would be the same or warmer than now. All the year round. Differences in seasons would not be as great as they are now.
the earth would die
In reality, the interior of the Earth is slowly cooling. In human time perspective, however, this cooling has no impact.
I sure would!
I sure would!
If the mantle of the earth interior were to cool down the convection currents and plate tectonics would stop. That would mean that there would be no more earthquakes or volcanoes.
If the mantle of the earth interior were to cool down the convection currents and plate tectonics would stop. That would mean that there would be no more earthquakes or volcanoes.
The earth's water would evaporate.
If Earth shrank in size but not mass, the compression would greatly heat Earth's interior. Surface gravity would increase.