It should be because it was "made" or "discovered" in london. so i dont see how it is renewable..
8th grade
Brieale
The above answer makes absolutely no sense and is totally irrelevant.
And no, neon is renewable.
-Moe
Yes, gold is considered a non-renewable resource because it is a finite material that cannot be replaced once it is extracted from the Earth. The rate of gold mining far exceeds the rate at which new gold is formed, making it a non-renewable resource.
Silicon is considered non-renewable because it is extracted from silica, which is a non-renewable resource that must be mined from the earth. Once silicon is extracted and used in products like electronics or solar panels, it is not easily replenished on human timescales.
no it is not a renewable resource as it is not a resource!
Sulfur is considered a non-renewable resource since it is primarily extracted from natural deposits, such as volcanic regions and salt domes, and cannot be replenished on a short timescale. However, it is abundant in nature and can be recycled from certain industrial processes.
Bleach is not a non-renewable resource. It is produced from common raw materials like salt and water, which are widely available and can be replenished. Additionally, the manufacturing process of bleach can be done sustainably to minimize its environmental impact.
renewable
Non renewable
Neon gas is not considered renewable because it is a rare and non-renewable resource on Earth. It is mainly extracted from the atmosphere through air fractionation, and once it is used, it is typically released back into the atmosphere. However, the supply of neon is limited and not easily replenished.
non-renewable
it is non renewable. it acts like coal which means it is not nonrenewable
It is a non-renewable resource, made from oil.
non renewable
Non renewable
non-renewable
Non-renewable
It's non-renewable.
Renewable - unlimited source Non renewable - limited resource