answersLogoWhite

0

sexy and i know it

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Earth Science

The fact similar fossils are found on both sides of the ocean is evidence of what?

sexy and i know it


The fact that similar fossils are found on both sides of the ocean is evidence of . global positioning oceanic drifts continental drift magnetic reversal?

continental drift. This is because the presence of similar fossils on opposite sides of the ocean suggests that the landmasses were once connected and have since drifted apart. This phenomenon supports the theory of continental drift proposed by Alfred Wegener.


Why are fossils so important to scientist trying to discover evidence of a super continent?

Fossils found in different regions can provide evidence of past geographic connections by showing similar species distributed across separate continents. By studying fossils, scientists can piece together the history of land formations and the movement of continents, helping to support the theory of supercontinents like Pangaea.


How did wegemer use as evidence based on fossils to support his theory that the continents had moved?

Wegener used the similarity of plant and animal fossils found on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean as evidence to support his theory of continental drift. He argued that these identical fossils could only have been separated by the movement of continents over time.


What fossils prove continental drift true?

Fossils of similar plants and animals found on separate continents, such as the Mesosaurus and Glossopteris, provide evidence for continental drift. Additionally, matching geological formations and mountain ranges on different continents support the theory of continental drift. Magnetic striping on the ocean floor also supports the movement of continents over time.

Related Questions

The fact that similar fossils are found on both sides of the ocean is the evidence of what?

Pangaea


The fact that similar fossils are found on both sides of the ocean is evidence of .?

continental drift


What is the fact that similar fossils are found on the both sides of the ocean is evidence of?

continental drift


The fact similar fossils are found on both sides of the ocean is evidence of what?

sexy and i know it


What are some features of the ocean floor that provide evidence for plate tectonics?

they found fossils


What is the evidence of seafloor spreading?

Animal fossils have been found in many places in the ocean.


What is an example of evidence from landforms that supported Wegener's idea of continental drift?

The same fossils found on different sides of the ocean.


The fact that similar fossils are found on both sides of the ocean is evidence of . global positioning oceanic drifts continental drift magnetic reversal?

continental drift. This is because the presence of similar fossils on opposite sides of the ocean suggests that the landmasses were once connected and have since drifted apart. This phenomenon supports the theory of continental drift proposed by Alfred Wegener.


What showed proof for Alfred Wegener on Pangaea?

We know Pangaea existed because of fossil evidence. There were fossils of the same animal found on Africa and South America. This animal couldn't have possibly swam across the ocean. Therefore, making the idea of Pangaea plausible.


Why are fossils so important to scientist trying to discover evidence of a super continent?

Fossils found in different regions can provide evidence of past geographic connections by showing similar species distributed across separate continents. By studying fossils, scientists can piece together the history of land formations and the movement of continents, helping to support the theory of supercontinents like Pangaea.


How did wegemer use as evidence based on fossils to support his theory that the continents had moved?

Wegener used the similarity of plant and animal fossils found on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean as evidence to support his theory of continental drift. He argued that these identical fossils could only have been separated by the movement of continents over time.


Why would the fossils of an ocean fish found on two diffrent continents would not be good evidence of continental drift?

Fossil of an ocean fish found on two different continents would not be good evidence of continental drift because Fossils of land animals are a better piece of evidence of continental drift than fish.