it provided evidence for the movement of tectonic plates over time by showing that magnetic minerals in rocks align with the Earth's magnetic field at the time of their formation. This helped support Wegener's theory of continental drift by showing that continents were once joined as a single landmass and have since moved apart.
People once believed the Earth was flat because it appeared that way to the naked eye. Travel and exploration were limited, so many individuals did not have access to evidence proving otherwise.
Yes, Percy returns the bolt to Zeus at the end of the first book "The Lightning Thief" after proving his innocence and loyalty in retrieving it from Hades.
Ferdinand Magellan was the first person to lead an expedition that circumnavigated the Earth, providing evidence that it was a sphere. Magellan's expedition departed in 1519 and was completed by Juan Sebastián Elcano in 1522.
There is no evidence proving global warming is not happening. A very tiny number of scientists (usually not climate scientists) try to find evidence but they have found nothing.There is a colossal amount of evidence proving it is happening:Temperature records rising and being broken.Sea levels rising.Ice caps and glaciers melting.Animal, bird and insect habitats changing.More unusual weather and more powerful storms.
Douglas Mawson led the Australasian Antarctic Expedition (1911-1914) and made several significant discoveries, including charting new lands, conducting scientific research, and proving the existence of a vast ice-free area known as the "Antarctic oasis." Mawson's expedition also made important contributions to our understanding of Antarctic wildlife, geology, and climate.
The scientific means for proving his hypothesis had not yet been developed.
One day while scientists were exploring the sea floor, they discovered sea-floor spreading, thus proving Wegener's hypothesis to be correct.
'THEORY'
'THEORY'
To do it right
Proving a hypothesis wrong is more helpful because then you know what is incorrect for next time or someone else.
The idea that you are testing or proving/disproving.
proving a hypothesis to be false.
you would figure it out my getting all the supplys you need and then testing it
No, accepting a hypothesis is not the same as proving it to be true. Accepting a hypothesis typically means that it is considered plausible based on available evidence, but it has not undergone rigorous testing or validation to confirm its truth. Proving a hypothesis requires systematic experimentation and analysis that yields consistent results, establishing it as a reliable explanation of a phenomenon. In science, hypotheses remain subject to revision or rejection as new evidence emerges.
kkk
This statement is correct because a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has not been validated through experimentation and evidence. Scientific inquiry aims to test and gather evidence to support or reject a hypothesis, rather than proving it true. It is always possible for new evidence or data to emerge that could challenge or refine a hypothesis.