Some possibilities are:
- change of color
- change of odor
- change of temperature
- release of a gas
- change of the aspect
- formation of a precipitate
- change of the viscosity
- an explosion
etc.
No, mixing sodium carbonate and copper sulfate is a physical change as the substances retain their chemical identities. A chemical change would involve a reaction where new substances are formed.
When two or more compounds are mixed together, they do not undergo a chemical reaction to form new substances. Each compound maintains its own chemical identity and properties. This is a physical change rather than a chemical change.
This is a chemical change because a new substance, iron sulfide, is formed with different properties compared to its original components, iron and sulfur.
When you change the composition of a mixture, you are altering the relative amounts of the substances mixed together, while their chemical properties remain the same. In contrast, changing the composition of a compound involves altering the elements that make up the compound, leading to the formation of a new substance with different chemical properties.
I could find 6,production of heatproduction of lightchange of colorchange in odorformation of a precipitaterelease of a gas
The properties mix together with the mixture.
Macaroni is a mixture not a change.
you can observe chemical reactions from its smell, colour, shape, or the change in it's properties
A mixture that produces a chemical reaction, scientifically speaking, is a chemical change.
By definition, a mixture is two or more substances that are physically combined. In a chemical change, the substance interacts with another substance and undergoes a chemical change. So, no, a mixture is not a chemical change.
It depends ont eh chemical change, because in some changes not all the components of the mixture are used.
physical change
The formation of a new substance is the criterion for a chemical change. You can't have a chemical change without the formation of at least one new substance. As you can't observe a chemical property without setting a chemical change in motion, the answer to your question is yes.
gas
Yes. If you observe a chemical property, the substance will be undergoing a chemical change, which by definition produces a new substance.
Yes. If you observe a chemical property, the substance will be undergoing a chemical change, which by definition produces a new substance.
Yes. If you observe a chemical property, the substance will be undergoing a chemical change, which by definition produces a new substance.