Well, I'm not an expert but it's a question that's still up in the air. You could argue that Gondwana or Laurasia were before Pangea but we still can't be 100%. My person opinion would be no, Pangea was not the first supercontinent, but you could argue that Pangea could be the first supercontinent because of the big lapse in time between all of the supercontinents, but again, my opinion would be no.
Pangea.
supercontinent
Pangaea is the name of the supercontinent that existed about 335 million years ago and eventually broke apart to form the continents we know today.
The supercontinent that began to break apart about 225 million years ago was Pangaea.
The two periods involved in the Pangea time frame were the Permian and Triassic periods during the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras, respectively. These periods encompassed the formation and breakup of the supercontinent Pangea.
Pangea is not a language. Pangea is a massive supercontinent.
Pangea.
Pangea.
Pangea
the name is pangea
They know that Pangea was the supercontinent because if you move all of the continents closer to eachother the sides match up .
The supercontinent is called Pangea, formed 300 million years ago
Pangea was the only supercontinent, which Wegner tried to prove. After Wegner died, scientists now believe that Pangea did exist and now believe that there was more than one supercontinent.
Pangea
The name of the first supercontinent to form is called Rodinia. It is believed to have existed around 1.3 billion years ago during the Neoproterozoic era.
It is because of Pangea I think because Pangea is a supercontinent Pangea-a supercontinent containing all of earths land that existed about 225million years ago
Pangaea