i'm guessing weather reports or analysis of acid rain
because scientist are payed by the government
Don't worry, the next Ice Age is not due for at least 100,000 years, but that is only a predictions based on scientists Info, It is based on patterns in the world.
The Maunder Minimum, a period of low solar activity in the 17th century, is linked to a cooler climate known as the "Little Ice Age." Some scientists suggest that understanding past solar variations like the Maunder Minimum can help improve climate change models and predictions.
Scientists base their climate predictions on computer models that simulate the Earth's climate system. These models take into account factors such as greenhouse gas emissions, solar radiation, ocean currents, and air circulation patterns to project future climate trends. By running different scenarios, scientists can estimate the potential impacts of human activities on the climate.
I think it is climate change
because scientist are payed by the government
Don't worry, the next Ice Age is not due for at least 100,000 years, but that is only a predictions based on scientists Info, It is based on patterns in the world.
Predictions
The Maunder Minimum, a period of low solar activity in the 17th century, is linked to a cooler climate known as the "Little Ice Age." Some scientists suggest that understanding past solar variations like the Maunder Minimum can help improve climate change models and predictions.
predictions based on hypotheses
Yvan Biot has written: 'What's the problem?' -- subject(s): Soil erosion 'Crop production forecasting based on long term climate predictions'
based on? they are based on tectonic plate movement.
Scientists use complex computer models known as climate models to calculate future climate change predictions. These climate models simulate the Earth's climate system by incorporating data on greenhouse gas emissions, land use changes, and other factors that influence climate. By running these models with different scenarios and assumptions, scientists can predict how these changes will affect global temperature, precipitation patterns, sea level rise, and other climate variables in the future.
i think its about the security, climate changes and famine if it is based on the community.
observations change.
Yes. If a scientific theory cannot be "falsified" - that is, proven to be not true - then it isn't "scientific". A scientific theory will always lead to some tests that can be performed. If the test fails - that is to say, if your theory doesn't behave in accordance with the experimental results - then we can say that the theory is "disproved". This is the problem with a lot of the "global warming" and "global climate change" hysteria; the computer models for climate change make a number of predictions, but the models don't behave as predicted. The global climate change theory is, if we judge by the results of the models, disproved.
probality Studies