0
What else can I help you with?
What is a part of a Pangaea hypothesis is called?
A part of the Pangaea hypothesis is called continental drift, which suggests that the Earth's continents were once connected in a single landmass before breaking apart and drifting to their current positions.
What is the hypothesis for soil?
The hypothesis for soil could be that the type or amount of organic matter present in soil will affect the growth of plants. This hypothesis can be tested by conducting experiments to observe the relationship between soil composition and plant growth.
At first many scientists rejected Wegener and the hypothesis of continental drift. What was their main objection to his hypothesis?
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
What is the Gaia hypothesis an example of?
The Gaia hypothesis is an example of a scientific hypothesis proposing that Earth functions as a self-regulating system, maintaining conditions necessary for life to persist. It suggests that living organisms and their inorganic surroundings have evolved as a single, self-regulating system.
What is the hypothesis of an earthquake?
The hypothesis of an earthquake is that a sudden release of energy stored in Earth's crust causes seismic waves to propagate, resulting in ground shaking. This hypothesis is supported by observations of seismic activity, fault movements, and geological evidence.
What will make Alexis' hypothesis valuable?
Any testable hypothesis is valuable.
How can rejecting be just as valuable or more valuable than supporting a hypothesis?
Rejecting a hypothesis shows you that it was wrong and it shows you what not to do. It can help lead you to a better, more accurate hypothesis the next time.
Why can a hypothesis be valuable even if its wrong?
Yes
What is learned if the data from an experience do not support the hypothesis?
some information; the data still provide valuable information about the hypothesis
What is learned if the data from an experiment do not support the. Hypothesis?
some information; the data still provide valuable information about the hypothesis
A hypothesis is most valuable in biology when it can be tested by?
observation and experimentation ~hpwizard112
Why is a hypothesis valuable even if it's incorrect?
A hypothesis is valuable even if incorrect because it drives scientific inquiry and experimentation, guiding researchers in their investigations. It encourages critical thinking and exploration, leading to new questions and insights. Additionally, testing a hypothesis provides valuable data that can refine theories and improve understanding, ultimately contributing to the advancement of knowledge.
Why do scientist consider an hypothesis valuable?
Scientists consider a hypothesis valuable because it provides a testable and falsifiable statement that can guide research and experimentation. A well-formulated hypothesis helps to focus investigations, predict outcomes, and establish connections between variables. By testing a hypothesis through observation and experimentation, scientists can gain insights, refine theories, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in a systematic way.
Why do scientists consider every hypothesis valuable A. A hypothesis requires no further investigation if it is proved by the experiment. B. A hypothesis can be used to explain a conclusion even if it?
B. A hypothesis can never be proven. It can be supported, unsupported, or partially supported by the experimental evidence. The experimental data resulting from a tested hypothesis can be used to formulate a new hypothesis.
How would you know if the hypothesis is supported?
exact science consists in: -observation -hypothesis -experiment -conlusion when this conslusion is valuable for a great range of observations, and several experiments prove this, it is generally accepted.
What is learned if the data from an experiment do not support the hypothesis?
You need to rethink your hypothesis so it is supported by the data.
Is the statement 'When a hypothesis is tested and shown to be incorrect the experiment is a failure' true or false?
False. When a hypothesis is shown to be incorrect, it does not necessarily mean the experiment is a failure. It provides valuable information and contributes to the scientific process by ruling out one possible explanation, allowing for further refinement of the hypothesis.
