The correct term is "sulfa" drug. It's a drug that contains the sulfonamide moiety. Most sulfa drugs are antimicrobials, though some are used for other purposes (some diuretics contain sulfonamide, for example).
Clarithromycin is not a sulfur or sulfa drug because it lacks the sulfonamide group. It is a drug in the group of macrolide antibiotics.
Methamphetamine is a highly addictive illegal drug that can have a strong sulfur-like smell when it is being produced in clandestine laboratories. The smell is often described as similar to cat urine or rotten eggs. It is important to note that the production, distribution, and use of methamphetamine are illegal and can have serious legal and health consequences.
yes celecoxib etoricoxib and pofecoxib (these three COX-2 inhibitor) drugs contain sulphur.
Both sulfur and sulfur dioxide molecules contain atoms of sulfur. However, sulfur is a diatomic molecule (S2) while sulfur dioxide is a triatomic molecule (SO2), consisting of one sulfur atom and two oxygen atoms. Additionally, both molecules have a distinct sulfur smell.
Sames as English - sulfur. Also spelled 'Sulpur.'
Cefizal is not a sulfur drug; it is an antibiotic belonging to the cephalosporin class. Sulfur drugs are antibiotics with a sulfur-containing chemical structure, like sulfonamides.
Clarithromycin is not a sulfur or sulfa drug because it lacks the sulfonamide group. It is a drug in the group of macrolide antibiotics.
sulfur
At the drug store
No, for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, there's no such chemical as sodium hydrochloric acid.However, there's sodium. And there's hydrochloric acid. And you could theoretically mix the two, though what you'd get would be salt water and probably a fire when the hydrogen that's being given off ignites, but there wouldn't be any sulfur in it. (Also, it's sulfa drug (short for sulfonamide), not "sulfur drug" ... though that's a minor point; they do in fact contain sulfur.)
Keflex is not a sulpha drug.
Bacitracin does have a sulfur molecule in its structure. If you are asking if bacitracin is a sulfa drug, then no, it is not a sulfa drug and can be used in patients with sulfa allergies for burns when silver sulfadiazene cannot be used.
No, sulfa and sulfur are not the same. Sulfa refers to a group of drugs containing sulfonamides that are used as antibiotics, while sulfur is a chemical element found in nature that is not used as a drug but has various applications in industry and agriculture.
I am allergic to sulpha and told this to the ER doctor and they prescribed this for me. I am not a medical expert and have now knowledge of medicine, but with that information I don't think they would prescribe this medicine with full knowledge the person taking it was allergic to sulpha. Took it for the 10 days with no problems.
Sulfur dioxide is a powerful antioxidant that helps prevent oxidation of sensitive drug compounds in parenteral preparations. It is effective in protecting against degradation and maintaining the stability and efficacy of the drug product. Additionally, sulfur dioxide is relatively easy to use and has a long history of safe use in pharmaceutical formulations.
Lyrica, which contains the active ingredient pregabalin, does not contain sulfur in its chemical structure. However, some formulations or excipients used in the drug may contain sulfur-based compounds, but these are not part of the active ingredient itself. If you have specific concerns about allergies or sensitivities, it's best to consult a healthcare professional.
Methocarbamol contains no sulfur. I'm not sure it's even possible to be "allergic to sulfur", but you should mention your concerns to your prescribing physician, who will give you an alternative if there's anything to worry about.