I'm not in Mr. Ellers class I need this for my Sience class-Plate tectonics report
One weakness of Wegener's proposal of continental drift was the lack of a mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's theory was not widely accepted at the time due to insufficient supporting evidence and the reluctance of the scientific community to accept such a radical idea.
The fit of the continents like pieces of a puzzle, similarities in rock formations and fossil records across continents, and the matching geological structures on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean all supported Wegener's theory of continental drift.
The discovery of mid-ocean ridges and the process of seafloor spreading in the 1960s caused scientists to rethink Wegener's theory of continental drift. This new evidence provided a mechanism for how continents could move apart and lent support to the concept of plate tectonics as the driving force behind the movement of Earth's lithospheric plates.
he theorized about the continental drift and he also said that a pangaea formed 200 million years ago
i.e. continental fit across the Atlantic Multiple species matches (best of which where shallow water or terrestrial where it was infeasible for them to cross such a large water mass) Mountain ranges fitted together both sides of the Atlantic
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory
yes it does.
His evidence was incorrect.
Plate tectonics, which refers to the concept of continental drift.
There was no evidence to prove it
He proposed the idea of continental dift, which is very cool!
no because then they would know least about the world
dont ask me freak
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
plate tectonics
He could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.
It was not excepted because they didn't believe him at all until it was proven!