-look at plate boundaries
-the creation of new sea floor at mid-ocean ridges
-alternating bands of magnetic rock on the sea floor
-simple fact that the continents all fit into each other
The fact that rocks formations formed during Pangaea, match on the shores of continents that were connected to each other during the time of Pangaea, same goes for fossils
Alfred Wegener proposed the theory of Pangaea based on the fit of the continents, similarities in rock formations, and fossil evidence across continents. He also noted similarities in geological structures and climate data that suggested the continents were once connected before drifting apart. However, Wegener's theory was not widely accepted until much later when additional evidence and advancements in plate tectonics supported his ideas.
Yes, the theory of Pangaea is supported by geological evidence which shows that the Earth's landmasses were once connected in a supercontinent about 335 million years ago. The idea is widely accepted in the scientific community as a plausible explanation for the arrangement of continents on Earth.
The existence of Pangaea, the supercontinent that existed over 290 million years ago, is supported by various lines of evidence such as the matching shapes of continents and similarities in rock formations and fossils found across continents. Climate data, including evidence from ancient glaciations and sedimentary rocks, also supports the theory of Pangaea. These pieces of evidence help scientists reconstruct the past positions of continents and understand Earth's geological history.
Alfred Wegener was unable to prove his theory about Pangaea because he lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move across the Earth's surface. Additionally, Wegener's theory was met with skepticism from the scientific community at the time due to the lack of supporting evidence and alternative explanations being more widely accepted. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas were finally validated.
Evidence such as the distribution of fossils, rock formations, and magnetic fields on different continents support the theory of continental drift and the breakup of Pangaea. The matching geological features, such as mountain ranges and coastlines, on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean provide further evidence that the continents were once connected. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates and the ongoing process of plate tectonics help explain the separation of the continents from Pangaea.
probably when you can prove it
The verb for proof is prove.Other verbs depending on the tense are proves, proving and proved.Some example sentences are:"I will prove this theory"."This proves he did it"."I am proving you wrong"."The theory was eventually proved".
Alfred Wegener proposed the theory of Pangaea based on the fit of the continents, similarities in rock formations, and fossil evidence across continents. He also noted similarities in geological structures and climate data that suggested the continents were once connected before drifting apart. However, Wegener's theory was not widely accepted until much later when additional evidence and advancements in plate tectonics supported his ideas.
Scientists prove a theory by conducting experiments, making observations, and collecting data that support the theoretical predictions. Consistent and reproducible results from these experiments provide evidence to support the theory. Additionally, peer review and scrutiny by other scientists help validate the theory.
Yes, the theory of Pangaea is supported by geological evidence which shows that the Earth's landmasses were once connected in a supercontinent about 335 million years ago. The idea is widely accepted in the scientific community as a plausible explanation for the arrangement of continents on Earth.
Yes, scientists have used fossils to prove that continents were once one big super-continent named Pangaea.
Alfred Weneger was trying to prove his theory of Continental Drift. Many other scientists before him had the same theory, but they never could prove it. He had five pieces of evidence.
There was no evidence to prove it
many differnet scientists doing expiraments that prove the hypothesis to be true-then it becomes a theory
The existence of Pangaea, the supercontinent that existed over 290 million years ago, is supported by various lines of evidence such as the matching shapes of continents and similarities in rock formations and fossils found across continents. Climate data, including evidence from ancient glaciations and sedimentary rocks, also supports the theory of Pangaea. These pieces of evidence help scientists reconstruct the past positions of continents and understand Earth's geological history.
A scientist can prove a theory by conducting experiments, collecting data, and analyzing results to see if they consistently support the predictions made by the theory. The more evidence that aligns with the theory's predictions, the stronger the support for the theory. Additionally, peer review and replication of results by other scientists help confirm the validity of a theory.
Alfred Wegener was unable to prove his theory about Pangaea because he lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move across the Earth's surface. Additionally, Wegener's theory was met with skepticism from the scientific community at the time due to the lack of supporting evidence and alternative explanations being more widely accepted. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas were finally validated.