Sandy or loamy soil tends to absorb water well due to its large particle size and pore spaces. Areas with vegetation, such as forests or grasslands, also absorb water effectively due to the roots and organic matter helping to improve soil structure. Conversely, impermeable surfaces like paved roads or compacted soil tend to have poor water absorption.
In a liquid, as at sea level water's boiling point is 100 degrees and it's freezing point is 0.
You would expect to see the most bubbles when water is mixed with sandy soil, due to its larger particle size and better drainage, allowing for better aeration.
Absolutely not.It can't.most plants roots are underground. the amount of air in the soil is very minimal,and it is used up by creatures in the ground.So there would not be any air for the root to absorb.Hope this is usefull! :)
On the leeward side of an island, you would typically expect to see less rainfall due to the rain shadow effect. As moist air is forced to rise over the high terrain, it cools and releases precipitation on the windward side, leaving drier air to descend and warm on the leeward side, resulting in less rainfall.
On a warm and windy day, you would expect the most evaporation to take place from a lake. The warmth provides the necessary energy for the water to evaporate, while the wind helps to remove the water vapor from the lake's surface, increasing the rate of evaporation.
No the water would drain around the chips. They would not absorb water.
no it would not absorb the most.
A parking lot, generally made of blacktop or concrete, would have more runoff. Grass, with earth below it, would absorb more water. Blacktop cannot be penetrated by water. Concrete can absorb water, but only a very little, especially as compared to a grassy field.
A longer hair root would absorb more water. This is because it has more surface to collect the water.
Root hairs help the root absorb more water and nutrients from the soil. The absence of root hairs would reduce the plant's ability to absorb water and nutrients.
it would absorb the water into the raisins to equal out the concentration within the water and the raisins.
The number one answer would be salt.
They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.
Porous rocks absorb water. Anything that can absorb water would not be good at containing it.
At the highest elevations to the north of Coronado's route, you would expect to find rugged mountainous terrain, likely part of a mountain range. These areas may have snow-capped peaks, steep slopes, and rocky outcrops, indicating high altitude and challenging terrain.
Neither. It doesn't absorb water.
glaciers