Energy sources generally all cause some impact on the environment, Some associated with their ongoing operation and some with their construction or site preparation.
Sources with low operating pollution are nuclear, hydroelectric, solar and wind. Hydrogen could be included but may release nitrogen oxides if a combustion process is used. Nuclear has waste handling problems with spent fuel, water reservoirs for hydroelectric can emit methane. Wind turbines are reported to disrupt bird flight and solar cells contain heavy metals which may cause a disposal problem.
Conventional sources of energy have been in use for a long time that usually cause pollution and are exhaustible. Non-conventional sources, meanwhile, are recent sources of energy that are inexhaustible and pollution-free.
Thermal energy sources such as fossil fuels release greenhouse gases when burned, contributing to air pollution and climate change. They can also cause habitat destruction through mining and drilling activities. However, some renewable thermal energy sources like geothermal energy have minimal environmental impact compared to fossil fuels.
Because when you depend on energy sources which are not renewable and they run out, you are (for lack of a better descriptive and effective term) screwed. However, dependence on renewable sources means you will hypothetically never run out of energy and renewable sources are typically cheap; the only cost is the initial setup and maintenance.
Wind energy does not directly cause pollution. Unlike fossil fuels, wind turbines do not emit greenhouse gases or other air pollutants during operation. However, some pollution can arise from the manufacturing, transportation, and installation of wind turbines, but this is typically minimal compared to the emissions generated by traditional energy sources.
Pros -It costs less Cons -Not sustainable -Produces carbon dioxide -Mining coal can be destructive -The large amount of coal ash has to be disposed -It produces a lot of smoke -Some coal contains small amounts of sulfar, and burned sulfar is one of the main courses of acid rain -oil spills cause pollution.
Yes. For example, burning logs for energy or fires causes pollution (smoke and ash)
here are a few of them: 1) they donot cause pollution. 2) they donot contribute to global warming. 3) they are renewable (i.e they donot get over).
A few are solar, nuclear, biomass, hydro power
Renewable energy can't run out. Non-renewable energy WILL run out. Renewable energy is produced at a constant rate, non-renewable is not. Renewable energy is free when the generator is built, non-renewable is not. Renewable energy does not cause pollution (with the exception of biofuels), non-renewable energy does.
because it is renewable that means it natural and can never run out. it can cause less pollution because it doesn't give out any once it is built. when people are building dams fr hydroelectricity they obviously cause allot of pollution because of the machinary and the fuel that is being used. however renewable enery doesn't create any pollution but building it does.
biomass
biomass
Wind and wave and tidal
The Benifets of wind turbines are that they are a clean source of energy that does not cause "Global Warming" because it does not put out carbon emissions. It produces little or me pollution. It makes use of renewable energy sources. It will also get us away from dependance on fossil fuels that are non-renewable resources.
Mainly two reasons. (1) The fossil fuels will eventually be used up. (2) Fossil fuels cause pollution.
Conventional sources of energy have been in use for a long time that usually cause pollution and are exhaustible. Non-conventional sources, meanwhile, are recent sources of energy that are inexhaustible and pollution-free.
Thermal energy sources such as fossil fuels release greenhouse gases when burned, contributing to air pollution and climate change. They can also cause habitat destruction through mining and drilling activities. However, some renewable thermal energy sources like geothermal energy have minimal environmental impact compared to fossil fuels.