0
Which of the following is not evidence supporting the theory of continental drift?
Wagner has a theory on continental drift and the evidence that did not support it is where we see the continental drift in examining species of animal and human life drifting from continent to continent without the aid of mechanical devices or some form of trasportation except for by their own feet and them being the drifters of the continents.
What else can I help you with?
How would you disprove the theory of continental drift?
The theory of continental drift has been well-supported by evidence from various fields such as paleontology, geology, and paleoclimatology. To disprove it, one would need to provide strong evidence that contradicts the observed patterns of continental fit, matching geological formations across continents, distribution of fossils, and other supporting data. However, to date, no such evidence exists to conclusively disprove the theory of continental drift.
What period of time was evidence supporting continental drift?
The evidence supporting continental drift emerged in the early to mid-20th century, with key contributions from scientists like Alfred Wegener and Arthur Holmes. By the 1960s, advancements in technology, such as ocean floor mapping and paleomagnetism, provided further support for the theory.
Which one of the following pieces of evidence did Wegener use to support his theory of continental drift?
the age of the rocks in the sea floor is all the same
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
Which is evidence supporting the theory of continental drift?
Fossil evidence, such as similar plant and animal species found across distant continents, supports the theory of continental drift. Additionally, matching geological features, like mountain ranges or rock formations, that line up when continents are brought together provide further evidence. Magnetic striping on the ocean floor also points towards seafloor spreading and the movement of continents.
Are fossils evidence of continental drift?
Yes, fossils are evidence of continental drift because similar fossils have been found on different continents that are now far apart. This suggests that these continents were once connected, supporting the theory of continental drift.
Did wegener use paleomagnetism?
No, Alfred Wegener did not use paleomagnetism in his theory of continental drift. Wegener's theory was based on evidence from fossil records, geological formations, and similarities in rock types and mountain ranges on different continents. Paleomagnetism became a significant piece of evidence supporting continental drift theory after Wegener's time.
Why is the continental drift theory a theory and not a scientific law?
The Continental Drift theory is a theory because there is no evidence to support it. Alfred Wegener developed the Continental Drift theory in the 1800's.
Is the ancient astronaut theory true?
There is no evidence supporting it, and all the more evidence supporting the less controversial models of human evolution, based on evolutionary theory.
How would you disprove the theory of continental drift?
The theory of continental drift has been well-supported by evidence from various fields such as paleontology, geology, and paleoclimatology. To disprove it, one would need to provide strong evidence that contradicts the observed patterns of continental fit, matching geological formations across continents, distribution of fossils, and other supporting data. However, to date, no such evidence exists to conclusively disprove the theory of continental drift.
What are Plate tectonics evidence?
The theory of plate tectonics has succumbed to the newer theory of continental drift. Scientists believe this theory today due to three main factors. First, the continents appear to fit together. When the continental shelves, as opposed to just the continents, are placed together, the fit appears uncanny. Second, the distribution of fossils is consistent with continental drift. Lastly, glacial deposits once covered parts of the earth that are currently tropical.ANSWER: The plate tectonics theory is relatively new and formulated only in the 1960s. The evidence listed above in the first answer can only support the continental drift theory which was developed by Alfred Wegener in 1912. Evidence that can support the plate tectonics theory are the age, depth of oceanic sediments, volcanic activity, geothermal gradient, gravity anomalies, paleomagnetism and seismologic evidence. If you are answering an exam question on evidence supporting plate tectonics, evidence supporting continental drift theory should only come later in your answer and should not be given too much emphasis, for the plate tectonics theory involves more than just the continental crust drifting around and cannot support the main hypotheses of the plate tectonics theory.
What period of time was evidence supporting continental drift?
The evidence supporting continental drift emerged in the early to mid-20th century, with key contributions from scientists like Alfred Wegener and Arthur Holmes. By the 1960s, advancements in technology, such as ocean floor mapping and paleomagnetism, provided further support for the theory.
Which one of the following pieces of evidence did Wegener use to support his theory of continental drift?
the age of the rocks in the sea floor is all the same
Evedence supported the theory of continental drift?
Evidence supporting the theory of continental drift includes the jigsaw-like fit of continents, similarities in rock formations and fossils across continents, and matching mountain belts on different continents. Additionally, the discovery of mid-ocean ridges and magnetic striping on the ocean floor provided further evidence for plate tectonics.
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
Which of the following provides evidence that the present-day continents were once one large continent that broke apart?
The fit of the continents' coastlines, identical rock formations and mountain ranges on different continents, and the distribution of similar fossils on separate landmasses are all evidence supporting the theory of continental drift and the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea.
Does the oceanic plate theory provide evidence for continental drift?
Yes
