0
Which of the following is not evidence supporting the theory of continental drift?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Wagner has a theory on continental drift and the evidence that did not support it is where we see the continental drift in examining species of animal and human life drifting from continent to continent without the aid of mechanical devices or some form of trasportation except for by their own feet and them being the drifters of the continents.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoThe question is incomplete.
No options (for which of the following) are given to answer the question.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agohuman remains
Wiki User
∙ 12y agocontinential drift
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoWiki User
∙ 11y agocomposition of meteorites
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoD. Magnetic reversals
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which one of the following pieces of evidence did Wegener use to support his theory of continental drift?
the age of the rocks in the sea floor is all the same
How did Alfred Wegener prove the theory of continental drift?
He didn't. Evidence which points to continental drift was discovered later, after he died.
Which one of following pieces of evidence did wegener usee to support his theory of continental drift?
The 100% correct answer is A similar fossil was found in Africa, South America, Australia, India, and Antarctica.
Pieces of evidence does NOT support the continental drift theory?
the continents fit together like a puzzle
What are the three pieces of evidence that supports continental drift theory?
Climate fossil and fossil climate
Evidence that supports the theory of evolution is called?
"Evidence". There's no special term to distinguish evidence supporting one theory in science from evidence supporting any other theory in science.
Is the ancient astronaut theory true?
There is no evidence supporting it, and all the more evidence supporting the less controversial models of human evolution, based on evolutionary theory.
Why is the continental drift theory a theory and not a scientific law?
The Continental Drift theory is a theory because there is no evidence to support it. Alfred Wegener developed the Continental Drift theory in the 1800's.
What are Plate tectonics evidence?
The theory of plate tectonics has succumbed to the newer theory of continental drift. Scientists believe this theory today due to three main factors. First, the continents appear to fit together. When the continental shelves, as opposed to just the continents, are placed together, the fit appears uncanny. Second, the distribution of fossils is consistent with continental drift. Lastly, glacial deposits once covered parts of the earth that are currently tropical.ANSWER: The plate tectonics theory is relatively new and formulated only in the 1960s. The evidence listed above in the first answer can only support the continental drift theory which was developed by Alfred Wegener in 1912. Evidence that can support the plate tectonics theory are the age, depth of oceanic sediments, volcanic activity, geothermal gradient, gravity anomalies, paleomagnetism and seismologic evidence. If you are answering an exam question on evidence supporting plate tectonics, evidence supporting continental drift theory should only come later in your answer and should not be given too much emphasis, for the plate tectonics theory involves more than just the continental crust drifting around and cannot support the main hypotheses of the plate tectonics theory.
What is geographic fit evidence of?
The continental drift theory and the plate tectonic theory
Which one of the following pieces of evidence did Wegener use to support his theory of continental drift?
the age of the rocks in the sea floor is all the same
What evidence does NOT support the continental drift theory?
it is the process of you finding it yourself!!!
Does the oceanic plate theory provide evidence for continental drift?
Yes
Who were the two scientists that brought forth supporting evidence to wegener's theory?
me and your mom
How might the redshift indicate there is evidence for the big bang theory?
The red shift doesn't just indicate that there is evidence for the Big Bang theory: the Hubble red shift is evidence supporting the Big Bang theory.
Is a hypothesis is more certain than a theory in science?
No. A theory is more certain: it is a hypothesis which has had some supporting evidence.
Evidence supporting the theory of evolution is provided by the field of?
plato G all of the above
