In poorer countries they have a small budget so how much they spend is very important. Since they have a small budget and need to make it last the quality of the material used is low. This makes the buildings poorly built and not well supported. Buildings are not made to withstanding side to side movements and so topple over. This causes building to fall over by either the earthquake itself or the aftershocks. When buildings fall people die
More than what? Some poor countries do not have much by way of natural resources, others do but they are exploited by richer countries. The ‘oil curse’ refers to the fact that a country with oiled resources may well be subject to much war and exploitation.
Perhaps its the fact that poor countries lack the infrastructure to appropriately respond. Yea, idk but i think its stupid .... jus sayin It's because poor countries don't have enough money to thoroughly recover from it. Rich countries can recover much easier
Water-rich countries include Indonesia, Brazil, and Russia, while water-poor countries include Egypt, Libya, and Yemen. Water-rich countries have abundant freshwater resources, while water-poor countries face challenges in accessing clean water for their populations.
Poor countries prepare for hurricanes by building sturdy shelters, establishing early warning systems, stockpiling emergency supplies, and creating evacuation plans. They also work to educate their citizens about hurricane preparedness and response strategies to minimize the impact of the storm on their communities. Collaboration with international organizations and neighboring countries is also crucial for providing additional resources and support during and after the hurricane.
Developing countries are often more vulnerable to earthquake damage due to factors such as poor construction standards, inadequate infrastructure, insufficient resources for disaster preparedness and response, and high population density in vulnerable areas. Additionally, limited access to technology and information may hinder early warning systems and effective emergency response.
possibly to avoid immigration in developded coutries and for the poor coutries to be fit enough to compete and co-operate with other coutries. states have to be independent and not rely on other states for grants and soliciting donations.
fifth is a rank of Pakistan in poor coutries .
If they produce in poor countries and hire workers from that poor country then they dont have to pay them as much because to them a dollar is alot. If they did it in they're country they would have to pay employees more. It's also good advertising.
it helps them get more money
here are some of the countries: Syria Iran Saudi Arabia Iraq Some countries even consider America to have poor human rights. and many more.........................................................
Highly likely, yes.
As with most health factors, osteoporosis will likely be found in greater frequency in poor countries. Early detection, better dieting, and a doctor's advice are more likely to be had in an affluent society.
The number may not be greater, but the effect can be. Poor countries have poor flood-control methods and general emergency response capabilities, so more people are affected than in rich countries.
all the countries who are very poor and have a little bit of food, clothes and many more.
You should give money to the poor because if we all give money to the poor than there will be no more poor people and Australia and many other Countries will be much better places to be plus it will be a much more merry environment
Rural countries are not necessarily poor, but poorer countries tend to have a higher proportion of rural populations. Factors such as limited access to infrastructure, healthcare, education, and economic opportunities in rural areas can contribute to higher levels of poverty in these regions.
poor countries wnted to have more colonies