When sulfur burns it reacts with oxygen to form sulfur dioxide, which is an entirely different substance from sulfur or oxygen.
it is a combustion. the word equation would be: sulfur + oxygen → sulfur dioxide the balanced chemical equation: S(s) + O₂(g) → SO₂(g)
Heating sulfur is a physical change. You're not changing the chemical composition of the sulfur, just the temperature. Now if you heat it to its boiling point and and it changes to a vapor it's a chemical change because you've changed its state of matter.(Actually changing the state of matter of an object is still a physical change, as it does not change the chemical composition of the element)
Burning of anything is a chemical change. Combustion (burning) is a chemical reaction; it is simply where oxygen is added to, for example, an element, and turns it into an oxide. Burning phosphorus would result in phosphorus oxide. P + O2 --> P4010
Burning sulfur in oxygen produces sulfur dioxide.
No, using oxygen to separate molten copper sulfide into copper and sulfur dioxide is a chemical change because new substances with different chemical properties are formed. This process involves a chemical reaction where the copper sulfide is broken down into copper and sulfur dioxide molecules.
It is a chemical change, an oxidation reaction.
Burning sulfur, or burning anything, is a chemical change.
Burning sulfur, or burning anything, is a chemical change.
Burning of sulfur (or anything else) is a chemical change, not a physical change.
Burning sulfur, or burning anything, is a chemical change.
yes
chemichal
Yes, because new product is formed.
Burning is a chemical change.
When sulfur is burning, it reacts with oxygen to form sulfur dioxide. The chemical formula for sulfur dioxide is SO2.
Burning is a chemical change.
When heating sulfur, a chemical reaction occurs. Sulfur undergoes a phase change from solid to liquid to gas as it is heated, but this is still considered a chemical change because the molecular structure of the sulfur is altered in the process.