answersLogoWhite

0

I could only find one argument that some people still debate as a "no evidence" theory. The argument by some is, if the Earth is indeed warming, it would benefit us rather than cause us problems or harm. This argument asserts that the period between 5000BC and 3000BC was when the Earth was at its "climatic optimum" and this is when humans first started to build up civilized societies. Plants and animals have usually thrived during the planet's warmer periods, as opposed to the ice ages which have caused survival problems for many species. New land would be available and agriculture would benefit. Although this argument doesn't really deny the existence of global warming, it does come under the banner of "no evidence" because of its suggestion of benefit rather than problem.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is two pieces of evidence that English is the global?

global warming?


Is global warming warming the greatest danger to brown bears?

No, not at all. There is no evidence that the global warming is affecting brown bears.


What evidence is there that global warming is a myth?

There is no evidence that global warming is a myth. There has certainly been a lot of misinformation on the subject, often from vested interests, but the clear consensus of climate scientists is that global warming is real and that human activities are substantially the cause of global warming since the Industrial Revolution.


Why does global warming affect the migration pattern of birds?

There is no evidence that "global warming" is causing birds to migrate differently.


Would polar bears in Mexico be evidence for global warming?

No, that would probably be evidence for global cooling.


What was John Browne's position on global warming?

On May 19, 1997, in a speech at Stanford University, Browne declared that evidence suggested that global warming could be real. He argued that evidence that burning of fossil fuels was contributing to global warming


What pressure groups are critical of the evidence of global warming?

Extremely conservative groups tend to be more critical of the evidence of global warming. This has more to do ideology than idiocy, even though over 97% of scientists acknowledge the existence of of global warming.


Who are the scientists working with global warming?

The work of 15 climate scientists is helping to educate the public about the overwhelming scientific evidence for human-caused global warming.


Where on earth is there evidence Global Warming?

At the poles we see that the icecaps seen to be melting.


How did the deployment of nuclear weapons effect global warming?

I am pretty sure the deployment of nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not affect global warming. There is no evidence to suggest that the deployment of nuclear weapons in the second World War affected global warming in any way.


Do you realize global warming is a myth?

The overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that global warming is real and primarily caused by human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels. The evidence for climate change is supported by data from temperature records, melting ice caps, and shifting weather patterns. It is important to rely on scientific evidence and expert consensus when evaluating issues like global warming.


Do evolutionists believe in global warming?

Not necessarily, as belief in evolution and belief in global warming don't really have anything to do with each other. That said, a person who believes in evolution is probably more likely to believe in global warming, as they tend to listen to what scientists say, and scientists are the biggest advocates for global warming being real.