answersLogoWhite

0

I think because it will flow with no obstacle on its way

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Earth Science

Where would gullies be more likely to form?

Gullies are more likely to form in areas with steep slopes and little vegetation, as these conditions can lead to increased erosion and water runoff. Regions experiencing heavy rainfall or with loose soil are also more susceptible to gully formation.


Where would gullies be more likely to form a field with plowed soil and no plants or a field covered with thick grass explain?

Gullies would be more likely to form in a field with plowed soil and no plants because the soil is more exposed and vulnerable to erosion from water flow. In contrast, a field covered with thick grass can help reduce erosion by holding the soil in place with its roots and providing protection from rainwater runoff.


Where would gullies form a field with plowed soil and no plants or a field covered with thick grass explain?

Gullies would likely form more easily in a field with plowed soil and no plants because there are no roots to hold the soil in place. The loose soil is more prone to erosion by water, leading to gully formation. In contrast, a field covered with thick grass would be more resistant to erosion due to the roots binding the soil together and reducing the impact of water flow.


Where would gullies form a field with plowed soil and no plants or a field with thick grass?

Gullies are more likely to form in a field with plowed soil and no plants because there is less vegetation to hold the soil in place and absorb excess water. The plowed soil is also likely more susceptible to erosion from rainfall and runoff. In contrast, a field with thick grass provides better soil stability, reduces runoff, and minimizes erosion, making it less prone to gully formation.


Where would gullys be more likely to form a field with plowed soil and no plants or a field covered with thivk grass?

Gullies are more likely to form in a field with plowed soil and no plants because the soil is loose and more susceptible to erosion from runoff. A field covered with thick grass helps prevent gully formation by reducing the speed of runoff and holding the soil in place with its roots.

Related Questions

Where would gullies more likely be formed?

a field with with no plants and plowed soil.


Where would gullies be more likely to form field with plowed soil and no plants or covered with thick grass Explain.?

Gullies are more likely to form in a plowed field with no plants because the loose soil is more easily eroded by water runoff. In a field covered with thick grass, the roots help to stabilize the soil and prevent erosion, making it less likely for gullies to form.


Where would gullies be more likely to form a field with plowed soil and no plants or a field covered with thick grass Explain.?

Gullies are more likely to form in a field with plowed soil and no plants because the bare soil is more prone to erosion by water runoff. Thick grass in a field helps to reduce water runoff, prevent soil erosion, and stabilize the ground, making it less likely for gullies to form.


Where would gullies be more likely to form?

Gullies are more likely to form in areas with steep slopes and little vegetation, as these conditions can lead to increased erosion and water runoff. Regions experiencing heavy rainfall or with loose soil are also more susceptible to gully formation.


Where would gullies be more likely to form a field with plowed soil and no plants or a field covered with thick grass explain?

Gullies would be more likely to form in a field with plowed soil and no plants because the soil is more exposed and vulnerable to erosion from water flow. In contrast, a field covered with thick grass can help reduce erosion by holding the soil in place with its roots and providing protection from rainwater runoff.


Where would gullies form a field with plowed soil and no plants or a field covered with thick grass explain?

Gullies would likely form more easily in a field with plowed soil and no plants because there are no roots to hold the soil in place. The loose soil is more prone to erosion by water, leading to gully formation. In contrast, a field covered with thick grass would be more resistant to erosion due to the roots binding the soil together and reducing the impact of water flow.


Where would gullies form a field with plowed soil and no plants or a field with thick grass?

Gullies are more likely to form in a field with plowed soil and no plants because there is less vegetation to hold the soil in place and absorb excess water. The plowed soil is also likely more susceptible to erosion from rainfall and runoff. In contrast, a field with thick grass provides better soil stability, reduces runoff, and minimizes erosion, making it less prone to gully formation.


Where would gullys be more likely to form a field with plowed soil and no plants or a field covered with thivk grass?

Gullies are more likely to form in a field with plowed soil and no plants because the soil is loose and more susceptible to erosion from runoff. A field covered with thick grass helps prevent gully formation by reducing the speed of runoff and holding the soil in place with its roots.


Why do scientist think gullies where not made by volcanoes because?

, too, assume you're talking about Mars simply because of the abundance of other Mars questions on here this morning. If you're not, my apologies. Anyway, the conclusion (gullies were created by water bubbling up to the planet's surface) is based on computer modeling of the atmosphere and how water would behave. However, there are other scientists that disagree and think the gullies could have been made by dust or wind. As evidence they point out similiar gullies on the Moon, where no water has been found.


How would glucose most likely be used by plants?

As a source of energy.


What would have most likely occurred if plants had not begun to live on land?

If plants had not evolved to live on land, it is likely that terrestrial ecosystems would have remained dominated by non-plant organisms such as fungi, bacteria, and algae. This would have drastically altered the development of terrestrial ecosystems and likely impacted the evolution of animals that rely on plants for food and habitat.


Does saying it is for them mean it is theirs?

It's a fine distinction, but the context would be important. In many cases, saying, "It is for them" means it will be theirs but it is not theirs yet.