Yes, during the time when Pangaea was present, temperatures may have reached 45 degrees Celsius in the center of the supercontinent. In other areas near the center, scientists believe the average monthly temperature may have been 50 degrees Celsius higher in the summer than in the winter.
(however, this is not definite)
If Pangaea had never happened, Earth's landmasses would have continued to drift apart due to plate tectonics. This would have likely resulted in different continents and ocean configurations. The distribution of species, geological processes, and climate patterns would have been vastly different compared to what we see today.
During the time when Pangaea existed, the climate in the center was likely hot and arid due to its distance from large bodies of water. This central region would have experienced extreme temperature fluctuations and a lack of rainfall, leading to arid conditions.
The climate of North America must have been much warmer and more humid than it is in the present day. This is because when North America was a part of Pangaea, it was much closer to the equator (see figure 17.5 on page 471). Since the equator receives the highest concentration of the sun's energy and heat, the climate is warmer. So when the super-continent split apart, North America drifted towards the north end of the planet to reach the position it is at today, giving it the present cool climate. The climate of ancient North America must have been close to the current climate of South Asia (places such as India), and Central Africa.
There definitively was a Pangaea. Pangaea implies one continent. Back when the earth was forming, there was no oceans, thus the whole earth would be referred to as Pangaea. Today continents would refer to how much land is above the ocean.
If Pangaea were to reform, it would lead to major geological shifts, such as the merging of continents, changes in ocean currents, and disruptions to ecosystems. This could result in extreme climate changes, biodiversity loss, and challenges for human populations in terms of migration and resource distribution.
If Pangaea had never happened, Earth's landmasses would have continued to drift apart due to plate tectonics. This would have likely resulted in different continents and ocean configurations. The distribution of species, geological processes, and climate patterns would have been vastly different compared to what we see today.
During the time when Pangaea existed, the climate in the center was likely hot and arid due to its distance from large bodies of water. This central region would have experienced extreme temperature fluctuations and a lack of rainfall, leading to arid conditions.
Carl Dominic B. Vasquez :) :) :)
The climate would be warmer. :)
The climate of North America must have been much warmer and more humid than it is in the present day. This is because when North America was a part of Pangaea, it was much closer to the equator (see figure 17.5 on page 471). Since the equator receives the highest concentration of the sun's energy and heat, the climate is warmer. So when the super-continent split apart, North America drifted towards the north end of the planet to reach the position it is at today, giving it the present cool climate. The climate of ancient North America must have been close to the current climate of South Asia (places such as India), and Central Africa.
There definitively was a Pangaea. Pangaea implies one continent. Back when the earth was forming, there was no oceans, thus the whole earth would be referred to as Pangaea. Today continents would refer to how much land is above the ocean.
If Pangaea were to reform, the Philippines would likely be situated near the western side of the supercontinent, as it was originally part of the eastern margin of Pangaea before the continents separated.
It would totaly blooow
Water would be easier to find and they would wear different clothing
Water would be easier to find and they would wear different clothing
Water would be easier to find and they would wear different clothing
AMAZING.