answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Which one is best ?a)Yes, but only if the extra food was sent to countries with starving people.

b)Yes, because it would decrease environmental degradation.

c)I don't eat meat now.

d)No, I don't see the need to eat lower on the food chain.

e)No, I like the taste of meat too much.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Yes people should eat at a lower trophic level b/c as you increase in trophic levels, the energy between them decrease by 90%.

Another benifit is that with the higher the trophic level, the more of a risk people can get toxins and diseases from previously consumed organisms....

so yes they should eat at a lower trophic level.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

1. Can feed more people

2. Can sustain more people

3. It's healthier

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Would you be willing to eat lower on the food chain in order to decrease your ecological footprint?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Use ecological footprint in a sentence?

An ecological footprint is a measure of human demand on Earth's ecosystem. An example sentence would be: She recycles because she wants her ecological footprint to be small.


How do you increase your ecological footprint?

Drive an SUV; leave the lights burning in every room all night; hold the fridge door open for ten minutes every hour; run the air conditioning with wndows open. BUT.... ummmmm.. Why would you want to INCREASE your carbon foorprint when soooo many others are desperately trying to DECREASE the overall carbon footprint of humanity? We all have a fairly small footprint, this is a hype issue. Having said that, there is absolutely no reasonable reason to not want as small a carbon footprint (or any pollutant footprint) as possible. What you want to be careful of though is that you don't shrink your carbon foot print at the cost of a much larger real pollution foot print. High efficiency bulbs are a great example. They do decrease the power consumption at the terrible cost of Mercury mining, florescence being used and a far larger real pollution foot print. They sure feel good though.


How many Ethiopians would use the same amount of resources found in an 6.7 ecological footprint?

6.48You


What countries have the lowest ecological footprint?

This would have to be the United States still. Despite their efforts the rest of the world is far more conditioned to recyleing than they are.A: A low ecological footprint is good. Actually the US is about the second highest in the world, after Dubai.


How does your ecological footprint affect earth?

It doesn't, the ecological footprint is a calculation of how hard you affect earth. Someone with a larger ecological footprint affects the Earth much more than someone with a smaller footprint because they use more of Earth's resources to maintain their lifestyle. Luckely everyone's ecological footprint is different, because if everyone would affect the Earth as much as anyone in The west, the Earth would only be able to sustain 1 billion people, and were with 7 times more than that ;).


In the US ecological footprint of each person is about 9.4 hectares. The Earth presently has 11.4 billion hectares of productive land and water. If everyone in the world lived at the same level of con?

A great majority of the world's population would have to be killed.


What is a sentence using carbon footprint?

If Bigfoot were made of coal, he would have a massive carbon footprint.


What is the ecological niche of a moose?

the ecological niche of a moose would be to eat grass


What does a footprint look like on the moon?

Due to there being no wind on the moon, as there is no atmosphere, it can be safe to assume that a footprint on the moon would look like a normal footprint, but wouldn't be affected by wind or rain. Therefore it would stay around indefinately. Basicly, its just a perpetualy fresh footprint.


How would picking up one piece of litter affect our Ecological Footprint?

If you pick up one piece and I pick up one piece and a million other people do the same then that will be a lot of litter taken up from the street and it will stop it from destroying our enviroment.


What ecological research methods would be best to use to study bird migration explain?

Molecular ecological research ... from a bio-ecological standpoint as the study of man as the ecological ... and restoration phases of land-use. Ecological ...


What would most likely lead to a general decrease in wages?

immigrationImmigration would most likely lead to a general decrease in wages. Immigrants are generally willing to work for less money than people already established in that country.immigration