Yes, because if you added any liquid sustance to it, you wouldn't only see the particles/cells in soil. You would also see the particles/cells of the liquid substance.
It depends on the soil. If the soil is in, let's say Florida, the soil would be moist. It would because it is a peninsula, it has many lakes and ponds, and it rains a lot. If the soil was in a desert, then obviously it would be dry. I hope this helped you! :)
Wet soil would typically erode faster than dry soil because water can increase the weight of the soil particles, making them easier to be carried away by erosion agents like water flow or wind. Dry soil is usually more stable and cohesive, reducing the rate of erosion.
you have been asekd to analyse some salt-contaminated soil. How would you separte the salt from the soil? (a) write out the method that you would use to obtain pure dry salt and pure dry soil. (b) draw a labelled diagram showing how you equipment would be set up for each stage of your separtion. obviously this is not an answer it is a question i just want question a because i really need this science mark anyone? please? please help me :P
"Sukka soil" in English is known as "dry soil." It refers to soil that is lacking moisture and may be dry and arid in nature.
A soil from a warm, wet place would likely be more leached of minerals and organic matter due to higher rainfall and microbial activity. In contrast, a soil from a hot, dry place would likely have higher concentrations of minerals and organic matter due to minimal leaching and slower decomposition rates. The warm wet soil would likely be more acidic and have less defined soil horizons compared to the hot dry soil which may be more alkaline and have clearer soil horizons.
It depends on the soil. If the soil is in, let's say Florida, the soil would be moist. It would because it is a peninsula, it has many lakes and ponds, and it rains a lot. If the soil was in a desert, then obviously it would be dry. I hope this helped you! :)
Wet soil would typically erode faster than dry soil because water can increase the weight of the soil particles, making them easier to be carried away by erosion agents like water flow or wind. Dry soil is usually more stable and cohesive, reducing the rate of erosion.
A dry mount slide is a slide that has no liquid or cover slip. This type of slide is commonly used for observing solid specimens under a microscope.
A wet mount slide is not recommended to be saved for a later class period as it can dry out and affect the quality of the specimen. It is best to prepare a new wet mount slide each time you want to examine a specimen to ensure accurate results.
thin and infertile soil
the soil is dry
It would get harder once they clay dry's.
Sand
they prefer dry
It may seem that dry soil can hold more water but that's not the case. If it is the same soil used in two different tests, then wet or dry, the soil will hold the same amount of water. The water soaked soil would appear to hold less water because it is already absorbing it's capacity (or closer to it), whereas the dry soil will hold just as much but will take more water to reach it's "soaked" point since it is dry and void of moisture.
If you replace it the desert wouldn't be the desert, it would have tons of trees and plants that need rich soil. Though, the desert heat would still dry up the soil and make it dry and cracked mud. So it's really no use trying to replace the desert's soil with grassland soil.
you have been asekd to analyse some salt-contaminated soil. How would you separte the salt from the soil? (a) write out the method that you would use to obtain pure dry salt and pure dry soil. (b) draw a labelled diagram showing how you equipment would be set up for each stage of your separtion. obviously this is not an answer it is a question i just want question a because i really need this science mark anyone? please? please help me :P