answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Do republicans want a strong federal government?

One of the Republican party's platforms is limited federal government. Whether they truly want that is up for debate.


A debate on national health care is a debate about?

The debate on national health care is a debate about whether or not the government should offer free health services to it's citizens.


How has the debate over federal state relations been affected by the efforts to increase homeland security?

It gives the federal government more power.


What best describes an important political debate between the North and the South during the pre-Civil War era?

whether states should be given more rights without federal government interference -study island


What best describes an important political debate between the north and the south during pre-civil war era?

whether states should be given more rights without federal government interference -study island


How did the great compromise resolve the debate over the state representation in the federal government?

It created a two house legislature


Does wikileaks serves the public interest?

WikiLeaks aims to promote transparency and accountability by exposing government and corporate misconduct, which can serve the public interest by informing citizens and fostering debate. However, critics argue that some leaks may jeopardize national security or endanger individuals. Ultimately, whether WikiLeaks serves the public interest can depend on the context of specific leaks and their consequences. The debate continues regarding the balance between transparency and potential harm.


What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in congress in the Webster-hayne debate in 1830?

whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧


What did Senators Robert Haynes of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in Congress in the Webster-Haynes debate in 1830?

whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧


What happened in the States Rights Debate?

The Federal government and State governments were arguing about the division of powers over the entire nation. The Federal government pushed for a unified national government, constantly moving toward an expansion of their power. The States argued that they could nullify laws which they didn't agree with. Eventually, the country split in two, with the southern states rallying together to fight the Federal government, as the Confederate States of America. The CSA lost the war, and that pretty much settled the debate. I would say that the debate ended when the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution was passed. Since that point in history, the States have had no check on the Federal government via the Senate. If you want an opinion, the Seventeenth Amendment should be repealed.


A debate about whether to sign a treaty with Russia is a debate about what policy?

foreign


Why is the principal of federalism still a topic of debate?

In a federal system, the National government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also holds significant power. The United States, Canada, Australia, and Brazil are some examples of federal systems. The balance Of power is something that will always be in debate.