economic policy apex :)
How much government should be involved in the economy
How much government should be involved in the economy
In a debate, a conclusion is formed through the collection of empirical data being presented at the start of the debate, as well as how the data are interpreted to people who are analyzing the debate.
The government may exercise appropriate monetary or fiscal policies. However, the degree to which the government should interfere in the economy is a matter of continuing debate, beginning with the FDR administration and the Great Depression of the 1930's.appropriate budgetary policy
In macroeconomics, GDP is defined as: Consumption+Investments+Government Purchases+Imports-Exports. This is the "guns versus butter" debate: every dollar the government spends on buying guns (or on government salary, buying pens for government use, etc) is one less dollar available for private consumption of butter. Though technically, since investment is also there, you could make it guns versus butter versus cows.
One of the Republican party's platforms is limited federal government. Whether they truly want that is up for debate.
The debate on national health care is a debate about whether or not the government should offer free health services to it's citizens.
It gives the federal government more power.
whether states should be given more rights without federal government interference -study island
whether states should be given more rights without federal government interference -study island
It created a two house legislature
WikiLeaks aims to promote transparency and accountability by exposing government and corporate misconduct, which can serve the public interest by informing citizens and fostering debate. However, critics argue that some leaks may jeopardize national security or endanger individuals. Ultimately, whether WikiLeaks serves the public interest can depend on the context of specific leaks and their consequences. The debate continues regarding the balance between transparency and potential harm.
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
The Federal government and State governments were arguing about the division of powers over the entire nation. The Federal government pushed for a unified national government, constantly moving toward an expansion of their power. The States argued that they could nullify laws which they didn't agree with. Eventually, the country split in two, with the southern states rallying together to fight the Federal government, as the Confederate States of America. The CSA lost the war, and that pretty much settled the debate. I would say that the debate ended when the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution was passed. Since that point in history, the States have had no check on the Federal government via the Senate. If you want an opinion, the Seventeenth Amendment should be repealed.
foreign
In a federal system, the National government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also holds significant power. The United States, Canada, Australia, and Brazil are some examples of federal systems. The balance Of power is something that will always be in debate.