Want this question answered?
Laissez-faire pertains as much to government as it does to economics. This school of thought states that government should play as minimal a part in private transactions as possible, only as far as to protect property rights. This means no taxes, or subsidies, or tariffs, or anything of that sort.
"Let [it] be" This means that there should not be any interference from the government. It is a phrase used to reflect the idea that the government should just let [it] be. There is a minimal amount of government interference in business.
All companies should distribute their profits evenly throughout the population.The means of production should be owned by the state.all companies should distribute their profits evenly throughout the populationThe government should guarantee a basic standard of living for everyone.The means of production should be owned by the stateThe means of production should be owned by the stateAll companies should distribute their profits evenly throughout the population.The Government should guarantee a basic standard of living for everyone(apex)
Certain types of Socialism hold that the government should own the methods of production; however, Socialism is a very broad category, and there are many sub-types, many of which do not hold that government ownership of production is desireable (or, hold that only some areas of industry should be government-owned). The Marxist theory of economics (a sub-type of Socialism) holds that the workers should own and operate the means of production, but it does not specifically state how they should organize to manage this ownership. Communism (as espoused by Lenin as a derivative of Marxism) specifically states that the government should act as the proxy for the workers (as the government is supposed to be composed of and represent the interests of the working class), and thus, under Communism, the government owns industry.
The government control defense mainly because they have the means to control and give orders for defense purposes. The government's purposes is not only for the public welfare but also safety which is part of the defense purpose of the government.
Laissez-faire pertains as much to government as it does to economics. This school of thought states that government should play as minimal a part in private transactions as possible, only as far as to protect property rights. This means no taxes, or subsidies, or tariffs, or anything of that sort.
Laissez-faire is a French term that refers to a hands off attitude of government towards business. The infinitive 'laissez' means 'to allow, to let'. The infinitive 'faire' means 'to do, to make'.Together, they're pronounced 'leh-seh-fehr', or more commonly (LESS-ay fayr).
When the phrase "You should use a happy medium" is said it means that you should be happy, and do and say things with a positive attitude.
One scientific attitude is curiosity. It is good for a scientist to always be curious about his surroundings. Another attitude would be open-mindedness. One should always keep the mind open to new possibilities. Another attitude is careful judgment. This means that one should not be quick to judge anything before getting all the information.
Attitude means simple behavior. Sometimes a way you act.
Zealous is an attitude. It means having zeal or intense enthusiasm.
one of them is that workers should control the means of production.
If you mean "attitude," it means that you come back with whitty remarks. Some say it's like back talking. Basically it means in general your being rude.
Speaking in a sassy way typically means being bold, impudent, or spirited in speech. Describing someone as sassy suggests that they have a strong and confident attitude that comes across in their words and tone.
It means they have confidence
Many people believe different things for the meaning of scientific attitude. Many would agree that it means that everything is calculated and precise.
The tolerance thesis is the idea that a tolerant society should tolerate even intolerant beliefs or practices, as long as they do not directly harm others. Proponents argue that this is necessary to protect individual freedoms and promote open dialogue within a diverse society. However, critics argue that this approach may ultimately lead to the acceptance and normalization of harmful ideologies.