Yes, and not only that, but such trade can be profitable for both countries due to comparative advantage.
The theory states that even if a country can produce both commodities more than the other there is still the need to specialze in the production of a particular commodity of which she has the lowest cost advantage and exchange it for the other, for trade between countries to be mutually benefitial."all things being equal".ASSUMPTIONS:1- there are only two countries in the world.2- there are only two commodities.3- trade between two nations are not restricted.by; ICE
Balance of trade
An absolute advantage is when trading only occurs between one or two parties. This is common in the Philippine economy since most industries are monopolistic.
There are many similarities and differences between Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage. Some simple differences between the two would be, comparative advantage uses the driving force of specialization. Another thing of comparative are, if one country has an absolute advantage or disadvantage in any kind of output, any of the other countries will maybe profit from majoring in and distributing those products. Absolute advantage has a country that economically has a benefit over another, in a precise moral, when it produces that moral at a lower cost. Also a country using the same contribution of properties a country with an absolute advantage will have superior productivity. A few modest similarities between comparative and absolute advantage are, both of these terms are two basic concepts to international trade. Additional details would be the two terms both produce a product more efficiently which gives them an absolute advantage.
internal trade- trade which is done within the boundaries of a nation or a country is internal trade external trade-trade which is done with other countries or nation is external trade by divya kalra
The theory of absolute advantage states that a country should produce goods that it can produce more efficiently than other countries. On the other hand, the theory of comparative advantage argues that a country should specialize in producing goods that it can produce at a lower opportunity cost compared to other countries, even if it does not have an absolute advantage in that good.
the advantage is that when you specialize you can trade with other countries and get the product they specialize in the disadvantage is when you want to trade with someone to gain there product you end up losing more or another disadvantage is you might accedently trade with someone that has the same product as you
The theory states that even if a country can produce both commodities more than the other there is still the need to specialze in the production of a particular commodity of which she has the lowest cost advantage and exchange it for the other, for trade between countries to be mutually benefitial."all things being equal".ASSUMPTIONS:1- there are only two countries in the world.2- there are only two commodities.3- trade between two nations are not restricted.by; ICE
china
The the difference in value between what a nation imports and exports over time is called the trade balance. If a nation exports more than it imports, it has a trade surplus. If a nation imports more than it exports, it has a trade deficit. This trade balance can impact a nation's currency value and overall economic health.
Balance of trade
Usually, trade between two countries does not involve ownership interest in the other nation's business firm.
The British were the dominant nation of the slave trade.
china
They're actually the same thing: Nation A sells a higher value of goods to Nation B than Nation B sells to Nation A. Whether you're looking at a trade deficit or trade surplus depends on if you're Nation A or Nation B.
An absolute advantage is when trading only occurs between one or two parties. This is common in the Philippine economy since most industries are monopolistic.
There are many similarities and differences between Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage. Some simple differences between the two would be, comparative advantage uses the driving force of specialization. Another thing of comparative are, if one country has an absolute advantage or disadvantage in any kind of output, any of the other countries will maybe profit from majoring in and distributing those products. Absolute advantage has a country that economically has a benefit over another, in a precise moral, when it produces that moral at a lower cost. Also a country using the same contribution of properties a country with an absolute advantage will have superior productivity. A few modest similarities between comparative and absolute advantage are, both of these terms are two basic concepts to international trade. Additional details would be the two terms both produce a product more efficiently which gives them an absolute advantage.