have few or no rights.
In authoritarian decision-making, opposition is often suppressed through various means, including censorship, intimidation, and repression. Authorities may use legal frameworks to criminalize dissent, control media narratives to limit public discourse, and employ security forces to silence protests. Additionally, co-opting potential opposition figures or groups can undermine their effectiveness. By creating an environment of fear and control, authoritarian regimes aim to discourage any challenges to their authority.
They certainly do, especially the political systems. For example, being a Presidential Republic has had a profound impact on US American identity, resulting in the general mainstream ideas about equality, justice, and personal freedoms which are concepts that are substantially less popular in authoritarian regimes.
Personal economic freedom is most limited in authoritarian regimes where government control over the economy restricts individual choices and entrepreneurial activities. In such environments, heavy regulations, lack of property rights, and limited access to markets can stifle innovation and personal wealth accumulation. Additionally, social and cultural factors, such as discrimination and inequality, can further constrain individuals' economic opportunities and freedoms.
Authoritarian
The command economy is the economic system that is associated with authoritarian governments and total control of the economy. The government imposes strict control of the production activities, pricing and exports.
According to the Economist magazine: 117 Jordan 3.93 Authoritarian regimes 118 Mauritania 3.91 Authoritarian regimes 119 Egypt 3.89 Authoritarian regimes 120 Morocco 3.88 Authoritarian regimes 121 Rwanda 3.71 Authoritarian regimes 122 Burkina Faso 3.60 Authoritarian regimes 123 Comoros 3.58 Authoritarian regimes 124 Nigeria 3.53 Authoritarian regimes 125 Cuba 3.52 Authoritarian regimes 126 Cameroon 3.46 Authoritarian regimes 127 Kazakhstan 3.45 Authoritarian regimes 128 Niger 3.41 Authoritarian regimes 129 Kuwait 3.39 Authoritarian regimes 130 Bahrain 3.38 Authoritarian regimes 131 Angola 3.35 Authoritarian regimes 132 Belarus 3.34 Authoritarian regimes 133 Algeria 3.32 Authoritarian regimes 134 Côte d'Ivoire 3.27 Authoritarian regimes 135 Azerbaijan 3.19 Authoritarian regimes 136 China 3.04 Authoritarian regimes 137 Swaziland 3.04 Authoritarian regimes 138 Afghanistan 3.02 Authoritarian regimes 139 Gabon 3.00 Authoritarian regimes 140 Oman 2.98 Authoritarian regimes 141 Tunisia 2.96 Authoritarian regimes 142 Yemen 2.95 Authoritarian regimes 143 Congo 2.94 Authoritarian regimes 144 Qatar 2.92 Authoritarian regimes 145 Iran 2.83 Authoritarian regimes 146 Sudan 2.81 Authoritarian regimes 147 United Arab Emirates 2.60 Authoritarian regimes 148 Zimbabwe 2.53 Authoritarian regimes 149 Vietnam 2.53 Authoritarian regimes 150 Tajikistan 2.45 Authoritarian regimes 151 Togo 2.43 Authoritarian regimes 152 Djibouti 2.37 Authoritarian regimes 153 Eritrea 2.31 Authoritarian regimes 154 Republic of the Congo 2.28 Authoritarian regimes 155 Equatorial Guinea 2.19 Authoritarian regimes 156 Syria 2.18 Authoritarian regimes 157 Laos 2.10 Authoritarian regimes 158 Guinea 2.09 Authoritarian regimes 159 Libya 2.00 Authoritarian regimes 160 Guinea-Bissau 1.99 Authoritarian regimes 161 Saudi Arabia 1.90 Authoritarian regimes 162 Central African Republic 1.86 Authoritarian regimes 163 Myanmar 1.77 Authoritarian regimes 164 Uzbekistan 1.74 Authoritarian regimes 165 Turkmenistan 1.72 Authoritarian regimes 166 Chad 1.52 Authoritarian regimes 167 North Korea 0.86 Authoritarian regimes
By most accounts, there is no such thing as an authoritarian democracy, since, by definition, democracies and authoritarian regimes are dichotomous.
yes
Authoritarian governments often refuse to admit they have problems.
oppression
Authoritarian
All authoritarian governments are not equally oppressive to their citizens.
Most countries are governed by a form of government, which can include democracies, monarchies, authoritarian regimes, or other political systems. In democratic nations, governance typically involves elected representatives and institutions that uphold the rule of law and protect citizens' rights. In contrast, authoritarian regimes may concentrate power in a single leader or party, limiting political freedoms. Ultimately, the structure of governance varies widely across different countries and cultures.
A democratic government is not an authoritarian form of government. In a democracy, power is vested in the people, who exercise it directly or through elected representatives. Citizens enjoy fundamental rights and freedoms, including the right to participate in political processes, express dissent, and hold leaders accountable. This contrasts sharply with authoritarian regimes, where power is concentrated in a single ruler or a small group, often suppressing dissent and civil liberties.
Protesters can use the Internet and cell phone technology to spread their messages.
In the 1920s, several authoritarian regimes emerged, notably Benito Mussolini's Fascist regime in Italy, which took power in 1922. The Soviet Union, under Joseph Stalin, solidified its authoritarian rule following Lenin's death in 1924, implementing policies that centralized power and suppressed dissent. Additionally, various military dictatorships arose in Latin America, exemplified by regimes in countries like Argentina and Brazil, which curtailed democratic processes and civil liberties during this tumultuous period.
Citizens often engage in revolutions due to widespread dissatisfaction with government policies or leadership, particularly when they feel their rights and freedoms are being suppressed. Economic hardship and inequality can also drive people to revolt, as citizens seek better living conditions and opportunities. Additionally, a lack of political representation can lead to mobilization against authoritarian regimes.