0
What else can I help you with?
Is the concentration ratio in a monopolistically competitive industry likely to be higher than for a perfectly competitive industry?
Yes, the concentration ratio in a monopolistically competitive industry is typically higher than in a perfectly competitive industry. Monopolistic competition involves a few firms that have some degree of market power due to product differentiation, leading to a higher concentration of market share among those firms. In contrast, perfectly competitive industries consist of many firms, each with negligible market power, resulting in a lower concentration ratio.
Are monopolistically competitive firms efficient in long-run equilibrium?
Monopolistically competitive firms are not considered to be perfectly efficient in the long run. This is because they have some degree of market power due to product differentiation, which can lead to higher prices and lower output compared to perfectly competitive markets.
Why is it that firms can earn profits in the long run in monopoly and oligopoly but not in monopolistic competition and perfect competition?
Because monopolistically competitive firms have an optimal production allocation at monopoly values: marginal revenue = marginal cost, marking-up to the demand function. When competition is not perfect, marginal revenue does not equal demand but is always below it on a Cartesian plane, so the optimal production value of a monopolistically competitive firm is both less and at a higher price than a perfectly competitive one.
Does monopolistically competitive firms have horizontal marginal cost curve?
No it does not. Only Perfectly Competitive firms have a horizontal Marginal Cost curve, which is also there demand curve.
How do monopolistically competitive firms earn profits?
Monopolistically competitive firms earn profits by differentiating their products, allowing them to charge higher prices than those in perfectly competitive markets. They attract customers through unique features, branding, or quality, leading to a downward-sloping demand curve. In the short run, if the price exceeds average total costs, they can earn economic profits. However, in the long run, the entry of new firms typically erodes these profits, as they offer similar products and increase competition.
Are monopolistically competitive firms efficient in long-run equilibrium?
Monopolistically competitive firms are not considered to be perfectly efficient in the long run. This is because they have some degree of market power due to product differentiation, which can lead to higher prices and lower output compared to perfectly competitive markets.
Why is it that firms can earn profits in the long run in monopoly and oligopoly but not in monopolistic competition and perfect competition?
Because monopolistically competitive firms have an optimal production allocation at monopoly values: marginal revenue = marginal cost, marking-up to the demand function. When competition is not perfect, marginal revenue does not equal demand but is always below it on a Cartesian plane, so the optimal production value of a monopolistically competitive firm is both less and at a higher price than a perfectly competitive one.
Does monopolistically competitive firms have horizontal marginal cost curve?
No it does not. Only Perfectly Competitive firms have a horizontal Marginal Cost curve, which is also there demand curve.
Bob and john are oligopolists in the market for ice cream. If Bob and John engage in a price war will the price of ice cream in their town be closer to Perfectly competitive market or a monopolistic?
Perfectly competitive, because both firms will compete to earn a greater market share (they are "price takers"), leading to prices that more closely resemble a perfectly competitive market than a monopolistic market (one dominant "price making" firm).
Which of the following could not prevent a market from becoming perfectly competitive?
excessive information
How do monopolistically competitive firms earn profits?
Monopolistically competitive firms earn profits by differentiating their products, allowing them to charge higher prices than those in perfectly competitive markets. They attract customers through unique features, branding, or quality, leading to a downward-sloping demand curve. In the short run, if the price exceeds average total costs, they can earn economic profits. However, in the long run, the entry of new firms typically erodes these profits, as they offer similar products and increase competition.
One difference between a perfectly competitive firm and a monopoly is that a perfectly competitive firm produces where?
perfectly competitive industry become a monopoly， what changes
One difference between a perfectly competitive firm and a monopoly is that a perfectly competitive firm produces where -?
perfectly competitive industry become a monopoly， what changes
Can a perfectly competitive firm set a price for its products that is above marginal cost?
A perfectly competitive firm would set its prices at a perfectly competitive price.
Does refractive surgery meet the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market?
I think that no medical practise can be tagged as a perfectly competitive market. In issues of health, we do not have perfect information about the best alternatives to consume (different surgeons), and that is one of the key requirements of perfect competition. Moreover, due to the reduced number of surgeons, they are able to control prices, being nearer to a framework of monopolistic competition.
Do perfectly competitive firms advertise?
Perfectly competitive firms would not advertise as advertising would serve no purpose. A market that is perfectly competitive exists only in theory.
Is service and quality likely to be better in an industry dominated by a monopoly or in a perfectly competitive industryWhy?
in a perfectly competitive industry
