sororal polygmy is practiced
the average household spends around £100 a week on energy, a cost which could easily be reduced.
When a big company buys or takes over another smaller company, competition is reduced, and customers have less choices.
The opposite of pure competition is monopoly. In a monopoly, a single seller dominates the market, controlling prices and supply without competition. Unlike pure competition, where many firms offer identical products and no single firm can influence market prices, a monopolistic market can lead to higher prices and reduced choices for consumers. Other forms of market structures, such as oligopoly and monopolistic competition, also differ from pure competition but do not have the same level of market control as a monopoly.
Monopolies are inefficient in the market because they have the power to control prices and limit competition, which can lead to higher prices for consumers and reduced innovation. This lack of competition can result in lower quality products and services, as there is no incentive for the monopoly to improve or innovate.
When the excess capacity problem under monopolistic competition becomes greater, firms tend to operate below their optimal output levels, leading to inefficiencies in production. This can result in higher average costs and reduced competitiveness as firms struggle to cover fixed costs. Additionally, consumers may face limited choices and higher prices due to the reduced incentive for firms to innovate or improve their offerings. Overall, the market may experience less dynamic competition and slower economic growth.
sororal polygmy is practiced
Industrial consolidation and trusts reduced competition during the late 1800's =)
yes
the average household spends around £100 a week on energy, a cost which could easily be reduced.
True
The voltage is reduced, in transformers.
The voltage is reduced, in Transformers.
Reduced competition among species in the same habitat due to consuming less of the same resources is known as resource partitioning. This can allow for coexistence by reducing direct competition for food and other resources. By specializing in different food sources or utilizing resources at different times or in different ways, species can minimize competition and better share the habitat.
Competition in the business world can drive innovation, improve quality, and lower prices for consumers. However, it can also lead to unethical practices, market monopolies, and reduced job security for workers.
The ghost of competition past refers to lessons or failures from past competitions that continue to haunt or influence present decisions and behaviors in competitive situations. It suggests that past experiences and outcomes in competitive environments shape future strategies and approaches.
Competition drives innovation and efficiency, as businesses strive to improve their products and services to attract customers. It can lead to lower prices and better quality, benefiting consumers. However, excessive competition can also result in market saturation and reduced profitability for companies. Ultimately, healthy competition fosters a dynamic marketplace that encourages growth and advancement.
A monopoly electric company limits consumer choice and competition in the energy market by controlling prices and restricting options for consumers to choose from different providers. This lack of competition can lead to higher prices and reduced innovation in the industry.