FALSE
a+ users
FALSE a+ users
If an indifference curve crosses itself, it violates the assumption of transitivity in consumer preferences. This would imply that the same bundle of goods provides two different levels of utility, leading to inconsistencies in consumer choice. In essence, it suggests that a consumer would be indifferent between two different consumption points that should not be considered equal, which is not rational behavior. Therefore, indifference curves are typically assumed to be convex and never cross.
A consumer's indifference curve represents a graphical illustration of different combinations of two goods that provide the same level of utility or satisfaction to the consumer. Points along the curve indicate that the consumer is indifferent between those combinations, meaning they would derive equal satisfaction from any of them. The shape of the curve typically reflects the consumer's preferences and the rate at which they are willing to substitute one good for another. Indifference curves never intersect and are typically convex to the origin, illustrating diminishing marginal rates of substitution.
Generally, because supplies are never infinite, the opposite of scarce. For many goods, demand is constant or growing, and supply is NOT.
In market economies consumers learn not to want things that are not supplied, so there can never be a real shortage in a market economy.
FALSE a+ users
FALSE a+ users
The perceived problems of consumerism is an insatiable lust for consumer goods that can never be sated. The consumer is constantly looking for the next new thing.
the inventions of the industrial revolution increased the supply of consumer goods as never before in history.
Unsought goods are products that consumers do not want, use, or even think about purchasing. An unsought shopping good could be a product that a consumer may not even know about--or knows about but has never considered purchasing.
If an indifference curve crosses itself, it violates the assumption of transitivity in consumer preferences. This would imply that the same bundle of goods provides two different levels of utility, leading to inconsistencies in consumer choice. In essence, it suggests that a consumer would be indifferent between two different consumption points that should not be considered equal, which is not rational behavior. Therefore, indifference curves are typically assumed to be convex and never cross.
Norwich has never been the capital of England. It was a regional capital under the Romans, but never the capital of the whole country.
Judging from the categories I suspect you want to know that South Australia nominated Mt Gambier for consideration to be the nations capital, but it was never really seriously considered.
No, it has never been the capital
Taking payment for goods with no intention of delivering them is considered fraudulent behavior, often referred to as "advance fee fraud" or "payment fraud." This act involves deceiving customers into paying for products or services that the seller never intends to provide. Such practices violate consumer protection laws and can lead to legal consequences for the perpetrator. It undermines trust in commerce and can cause significant financial harm to victims.
No, Sauk Rapids was never the state capital of Minnesota. The capital was originally located in Saint Paul, which became the official capital in 1849. Sauk Rapids was considered as a potential capital location, but it ultimately did not succeed in becoming one. Saint Paul has remained the state capital since its designation.
Unlimited goods is something that never runs out. Example: I have a phone and everything is Unlimited. that means that you can use it and it never runs out.