0
Price setters are those companies that dictate the price its customers pay for goods and services.
Price takers are those companies that cannot dictate their prices but their prices are dependent on the market.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between Price taker vs price setter?
Price setters are those companies that dictate the price its customers pay for goods and services. Pricetakers are those companies that cannot dictate their prices but their prices are dependent on the market.
Does monopolists differ from perfect competitors because monopolists makes a profit?
Not because of that reason but rather a result of the different characteristic of the two market structures. Basis of difference : MONOPOLY PERFECT COMPETITION 1) Number of producer 1 Many 2) Knowledge imperfect perfect 3) Price setter/taker setter taker 4) Nature of goods no substitute/ imperfect sub. homogeneous 5) Barriers to entry very high no 5) Factor mobility Factor immobility perfectly mobile 6) Profits in LR supernormal/normal normal
Which do you think a firm would prefer price setter or price taker?
They would prefer to be a price setter. This would imply control over the price. In some models this is a monopoly or an oligopoly. (As a side note, in the real world, EVERY firm has some control over the price of their good no matter how small that control may be, but this answer refers to models.) The technical reason for this is because in an economy in which firms are price takers, firms produce at the level where their Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost, but Marginal Revenue is set (it's the price. In a perfectly competitive economy it's also the minimum of the Average Variable Cost curve). So they can only vary their Marginal Cost by changing how much they produce. In a price setter economy, the price curve is changeable by the price setting. They will also produce where MR = MS, but they will produce a lesser quantity of goods because this artificial shortage will raise the price. This ALWAYS results in a higher profit than in a competitive economy.
Why producers are price takers and not price makers?
Producers are not strictly price-takers. Generally, the more competitive a market is, the less pricing power a firm has, and the more of a price-taker it is than a price-maker. Since basic economic analysis usually focuses on a perfectly competitive market, a producer is a price-taker because it cannot change its price from the equilibrium condition Price = Marginal Cost = Marginal Revenue because it will be undersold by its competitors if it raises it price.
A firm under a perfact competition is a price-taker not price-maker with examples?
it is a price taker because under perfect competition,price is determined by the market(through price mechanism:demand and supply) and not producer.this is because there are so many producers of the same product and all have the perfect knowledge of the market and there is only one buyer of that product,so no body can decide the price of the commodity on behalf of others.thats why a firm under perfect competition is a price taker and not a price maker. As part of the industry, the firm has to simply charge price determined by the industry. If the firm charges more price, it will lose sales and if it charges less price it will incur losses. The typical example of perfect competition is agriculture. The products are indistinguishable. There are many potential suppliers. This makes the farmer a price taker; if he or she prices the product higher than the market price, he or she will not make any sales or make fewer sales, thus incurring loss. Thus the farmer has to go with the price determined by the industry in order to survive
What is the difference between Price taker vs price setter?
Price setters are those companies that dictate the price its customers pay for goods and services. Pricetakers are those companies that cannot dictate their prices but their prices are dependent on the market.
Does monopolists differ from perfect competitors because monopolists makes a profit?
Not because of that reason but rather a result of the different characteristic of the two market structures. Basis of difference : MONOPOLY PERFECT COMPETITION 1) Number of producer 1 Many 2) Knowledge imperfect perfect 3) Price setter/taker setter taker 4) Nature of goods no substitute/ imperfect sub. homogeneous 5) Barriers to entry very high no 5) Factor mobility Factor immobility perfectly mobile 6) Profits in LR supernormal/normal normal
What is the difference between TT and TC in railway?
TT is a ticket taker and TC is a ticket chaker
Which do you think a firm would prefer price setter or price taker?
They would prefer to be a price setter. This would imply control over the price. In some models this is a monopoly or an oligopoly. (As a side note, in the real world, EVERY firm has some control over the price of their good no matter how small that control may be, but this answer refers to models.) The technical reason for this is because in an economy in which firms are price takers, firms produce at the level where their Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost, but Marginal Revenue is set (it's the price. In a perfectly competitive economy it's also the minimum of the Average Variable Cost curve). So they can only vary their Marginal Cost by changing how much they produce. In a price setter economy, the price curve is changeable by the price setting. They will also produce where MR = MS, but they will produce a lesser quantity of goods because this artificial shortage will raise the price. This ALWAYS results in a higher profit than in a competitive economy.
Why producers are price takers and not price makers?
Producers are not strictly price-takers. Generally, the more competitive a market is, the less pricing power a firm has, and the more of a price-taker it is than a price-maker. Since basic economic analysis usually focuses on a perfectly competitive market, a producer is a price-taker because it cannot change its price from the equilibrium condition Price = Marginal Cost = Marginal Revenue because it will be undersold by its competitors if it raises it price.
A firm under a perfact competition is a price-taker not price-maker with examples?
it is a price taker because under perfect competition,price is determined by the market(through price mechanism:demand and supply) and not producer.this is because there are so many producers of the same product and all have the perfect knowledge of the market and there is only one buyer of that product,so no body can decide the price of the commodity on behalf of others.thats why a firm under perfect competition is a price taker and not a price maker. As part of the industry, the firm has to simply charge price determined by the industry. If the firm charges more price, it will lose sales and if it charges less price it will incur losses. The typical example of perfect competition is agriculture. The products are indistinguishable. There are many potential suppliers. This makes the farmer a price taker; if he or she prices the product higher than the market price, he or she will not make any sales or make fewer sales, thus incurring loss. Thus the farmer has to go with the price determined by the industry in order to survive
A purely competitive firm is precluded from making economic profit in the long run because?
it is a price taker
Distinguish perfect competition and imperfect competition?
In imperfect competition the producer is the price maker. Whereas in perfect the producer is the price taker meaning there are many producers and no one can influence the price.
What if a local California avocado stand operates in perfectly competitive market that stand owner will be a?
It would be a price taker
Is John Adams a risk taker or cautious?
He was a risk-taker
Firm under perfect competition is price taker and not the price makerdiscuss?
Short answer: firm is a price-taker because there are numerous firms and consumers which will defeat any price change they make.Long answer: An assumption of perfect competition is that prices remain at the following equilibrium:Price = Marginal cost = DemandIn this situation, the firm is a 'price-taker' because it has no ability to change the price of the good itself (and thus increase its profit margin). This occurs because there are many, equally good firms which will simply keep their price lower if any firm attempts to raise the price. In general, because consumers will buy from the lowest priced-supplier, firms will continually lower their price to make the most profit until the point where P = MC (this being where they can no longer profit from lowering their price). Therefore, firms have no power to make the price because any change they make will simply be defeated by enemy firms or consumers and thus they 'take' whatever price there is.
What is the difference between Price taker vs price searcher?
Price SearchersPrice searchers have some power to set their prices because they are selling differentiated products. They are facing a typically downward-sloping demand curve. To price searchers, single-pricing means that the price for all units must be lowered just to sell one more unit. As a result, the additional revenue (MR) generated by selling one more unit will be lower than the price (P) itself.Price TakersPrice takers accept whatever the market price happens to be. They have no market power to charge a different price because its many free-entry competitors are selling identical products. They face a typically horizontal demand curve.
