The higher the productivity , the higher the living standard of the country. It also contributes in growth in output and income of the country.
Some economists argue that payment by cheque is the same as giving trade credit since both involve transactions which are not made in cash .
Economists typically oppose price controls because they can lead to market distortions, such as shortages or surpluses. When prices are artificially capped, it can discourage production and investment, leading to reduced supply. Additionally, price controls can disrupt the natural mechanism of supply and demand, resulting in inefficiencies and misallocation of resources in the economy. Overall, economists argue that allowing prices to fluctuate freely helps maintain a balanced and efficient market.
Physiocrats were a group of pre-classical economists in France who argued that the wealth of a country was made from the productive work of its labour, especially in agriculture. They advocated support and capital investment in agriculture.
Resource markets will set incomes based on workers' contributions to the output of scarce goods and services
Economists would argue that a price ceiling will lead to demand outrunning supply, leading to a shortage of the product. Although a few "real world" examples back this up, there are no set in stone answers to such complex issues.
Some economists argue that payment by cheque is the same as giving trade credit since both involve transactions which are not made in cash .
Some economists maintain that under the conditions of a liquidity trap. Today, most economists favor a low and steady rate of inflation.
Economists typically oppose price controls because they can lead to market distortions, such as shortages or surpluses. When prices are artificially capped, it can discourage production and investment, leading to reduced supply. Additionally, price controls can disrupt the natural mechanism of supply and demand, resulting in inefficiencies and misallocation of resources in the economy. Overall, economists argue that allowing prices to fluctuate freely helps maintain a balanced and efficient market.
Capture the readers interest and to explain, or to discuss and argue for your thesis.
Physiocrats were a group of pre-classical economists in France who argued that the wealth of a country was made from the productive work of its labour, especially in agriculture. They advocated support and capital investment in agriculture.
Resource markets will set incomes based on workers' contributions to the output of scarce goods and services
Argue in Math is when you protest the answer or suggestion that is chosen. For example (4+2)3= 12 that equation is wrong so you put it in the right way, solve and explain it that would be called an argue.Hope this helped! :)- AestrellaT
a social term, not an important physical construction.
There is a divided opinion between the free market(or classical) economists and Keynesian economists in this argument The Free market economists argue that the government shouldn't have any role whatsoever in interefering with the market and should let the market continues on its normal business cycle. The Keynesian economoists would argue that the government has a role to "tame" the economic cycles (making less boom and also less recession). However, economic cycles are a natural occurance in any economic system and can't be destroyed (or doesn't yet has an example of an economic cycle being destroyed.) Most governments however do interefere with the market (an example would be huge stimulus packages by governments during the global recession of 2008-2009).
That depends on the person. It's important to some people, and isn't important to others. The ones to whom it's important might argue that it will be important to the others at some point in the future (i.e. after they're dead). The ones to whom it's not might argue the exact opposite.
Economists would argue that a price ceiling will lead to demand outrunning supply, leading to a shortage of the product. Although a few "real world" examples back this up, there are no set in stone answers to such complex issues.
Pennsylvania had more great people and They <lways had to argue about it!!! SO This is the best answer about this because Its Population And Important people are A lot to say so that had to argue!!!