There is more than one way to answer the question, depending on what you mean by 'economy' and 'dollars'.
I'll begin by answering the literal translation of the question:
No, because the government is part of the economy. It is not taking money out of the economy. Only bankruptcies and write-downs can do that. But government does redirect money within the economy.
If you meant to say 'private sector' rather than 'economy', then the answer is a very qualified yes. Whether through taxation or borrowing, those dollars are being redirected out of the private sector. But only for a very short while.
Large sums of government money go to private sector enterprises fairly directly. However, even the money that goes to government workers or entitlement recipients goes straight to the private sector (except for the taxes they pay). This is because government workers and entitlement recipients depend on the private sector for the vast majority of the goods and services they consume. They gladly give up their dollars for those goods and services.
The reason it appears dollars are being taken out of the private sector is because of what dollars represent - access to goods and services. A portion of the goods and services produced by the private sector is consumed by government workers and entitlement recipients. Thus, it might appear that if they weren't consuming what they were then there would be more for everyone else. However, unless government workers and entitlement recipients were to be imprisoned or killed, they would consume those resources anyway. In that respect, they do not cost anything more to the economy than if they were working in the private sector.
The only thing the government can take from the economy is productivity. However, it can also aid in productivity - such as the differing roles it played in the development of transportation infrastructure (primarily railroads and highways) and the like. Whether government's overall impact on economic productivity is currently positive or negative is always a subject of much, often impassioned, debate.
Finally, when the government borrows dollars in order to spend them, it opens the door to a process called 'monetizing the debt'. The debt must first exist to be monetized. Monetizing government debt is one of the ways money is created in our economy. Thus, it is possible that some of the dollars government spends exist solely because the government spent borrowed dollars in the past.
Spend, Spend, Spend!! Spend your money to boost America's GDP and its economy. Increase the worth of your dollar.
A decade of republican government put the economy in debt. During Reagan's time the money was spend on defense spending.
The government can change its expenditures and its tax collection in order to achieve full employment, control inflation, or encourage growth. By increasing taxes and reining in expenditures, it helps contract the economy. The government can lower taxes and spend more in order to expand the economy.
increase taxes and and spend systematically
free market economy is an economy ruled by the people, not the government. individuals make decisions about their employment, how to use or accumulate money what to buy and to save money or spend it.
Spend, Spend, Spend!! Spend your money to boost America's GDP and its economy. Increase the worth of your dollar.
A decade of republican government put the economy in debt. During Reagan's time the money was spend on defense spending.
The government can change its expenditures and its tax collection in order to achieve full employment, control inflation, or encourage growth. By increasing taxes and reining in expenditures, it helps contract the economy. The government can lower taxes and spend more in order to expand the economy.
Lower taxes to make it easier for consumers and business to spend money.
increase taxes and and spend systematically
Government spending increases aggregate demand by giving money to individuals and business to hopefully spend.
free market economy is an economy ruled by the people, not the government. individuals make decisions about their employment, how to use or accumulate money what to buy and to save money or spend it.
They would do this when the economy is weak.
They would do this when the economy is weak.
The government increased spending to help the lagging economy. A little economy now will provide more money to spend in the future. The economy-sized jar of peanut butter is not always a better buy.
When the economy is good, most people have jobs and an income, so (1) they have money to spend and the government collects taxes on sales transaction; and (2) fewer people are applying for unemployment or welfare.
They believed that the government should spend money to help the economy.