Microeconomics and macroeconomics are interconnected in the field of economics through their focus on different levels of economic activity. Microeconomics examines individual markets, firms, and consumers, while macroeconomics looks at the overall economy, including factors like inflation, unemployment, and economic growth. Changes in the macroeconomy can impact individual markets and vice versa, demonstrating the interdependence between the two branches of economics.
the contribution of macroeconomics to microeconomics
Economics is the branch of social science that studies the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The term economics comes from the Greek for oikos (h ouse) and nomos (custom or law), hence "rules of the house(hold) Modern Economics developed out of the broader field of political economy in the late 19th century, owing to a desire to use an empirical approach more akin to the physical sciences The subject thus defined involves the study of choices as they are affected by incentives and resources.Areas of economics may be divided or classified into various types, including: * microeconomics and macroeconomics * positive economics ("what is") and normative economics ("what ought to be") * mainstream economics and heterodox economics * fields and broader categories within economics. source: www.en.wikipedia.org
importance of statistics in field of economics
Macroeconomics is the branch of economics that deals with aggregate economic decision or behavior of an economy as a whole; for example, the problem of inflation, level of unemployment, and payment of a deficit. To put it simply, it studies the economy as a whole.In contrast, Microeconomics is the branch of economics that studies the behavior of an individual decision-making unit such as an individual firm, their relationship with the market, at what price to set a commodity, how much of a commodity should be produced, how an individual uses their income to maximize satisfaction, and how the price of each commodity in the market is affected by the forces of supply and demand.For example, macroeconomics deals with GDP, inflation, interest rates, and unemployment. Microeconomics deals with the economics of health care or agriculture or labor. For instance, a macroeconomist would study GDP numbers, Fed moves, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, or the Producer Price Index. A microeconomist, on the other hand, might attempt to study the economics of labor (ie: unions, labor shifts, etc).Although "micro" means small and "macro" means large, the two shouldn't be separated by the size of an economy or firm. For example, Wal-Mart may be many times the size of the economy of a small nation; however, Wal-Mart's costs and supply/demand curves will be governed by microeconomic decisions while the GDP of the small economy is an aspect of macroeconomics.More Information:Microeconomics is generally the study of individuals and business decisions; macroeconomics looks at higher up country and government decisions. Macroeconomics and microeconomics, and their wide array of underlying concepts, have been the subject of a great deal of writings. The field of study is vast; here is a brief summary of what each covers:Microeconomics is the study of decisions that people and businesses make regarding the allocation of resources and prices of goods and services. This means also taking into account taxes and regulations created by governments. Microeconomics focuses on supply and demand and other forces that determine the price levels seen in the economy. For example, microeconomics would look at how a specific company could maximize it's production and capacity so it could lower prices and better compete in its industry.Macroeconomics, on the other hand, is the field of economics that studies the behavior of the economy as a whole and not just on specific companies, but entire industries and economies. This looks at economy-wide phenomena, such as Gross National Product (GDP) and how it is affected by changes in unemployment, national income, rate of growth, and price levels. For example, macroeconomics would look at how an increase/decrease in net exports would affect a nation's capital account or how GDP would be affected by unemployment rate.While these two studies of economics appear to be different, they are actually interdependent and complement one another since there are many overlapping issues between the two fields. For example, increased inflation (macro effect) would cause the price of raw materials to increase for companies and in turn affect the end product's price charged to the public.The bottom line is that microeconomics takes a bottoms-up approach to analyzing the economy while macroeconomics takes a top-down approach. Regardless, both micro- and macroeconomics provide fundamental tools for any finance professional and should be studied together in order to fully understand how companies operate and earn revenues and thus, how an entire economy is managed and sustained.
Macroeconomics is the branch of Economics that deals with aggregate economic decision or behavior of an economy as a whole; for example, the problem of inflation, level of unemployment, and payment of a deficit. To put it simply, it studies the economy as a whole.In contrast, Microeconomics is the branch of economics that studies the behavior of an individual decision-making unit such as an individual firm, their relationship with the market, at what price to set a commodity, how much of a commodity should be produced, how an individual uses their income to maximize satisfaction, and how the price of each commodity in the market is affected by the forces of supply and demand.For example, macroeconomics deals with GDP, inflation, interest rates, and unemployment. Microeconomics deals with the economics of health care or agriculture or labor. For instance, a macroeconomist would study GDP numbers, Fed moves, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, or the Producer Price Index. A microeconomist, on the other hand, might attempt to study the economics of labor (ie: unions, labor shifts, etc).Although "micro" means small and "macro" means large, the two shouldn't be separated by the size of an economy or firm. For example, Wal-Mart may be many times the size of the economy of a small nation; however, Wal-Mart's costs and supply/demand curves will be governed by microeconomic decisions while the GDP of the small economy is an aspect of macroeconomics.More Information:Microeconomics is generally the study of individuals and business decisions; macroeconomics looks at higher up country and government decisions. Macroeconomics and microeconomics, and their wide array of underlying concepts, have been the subject of a great deal of writings. The field of study is vast; here is a brief summary of what each covers:Microeconomics is the study of decisions that people and businesses make regarding the allocation of resources and prices of goods and services. This means also taking into account taxes and regulations created by governments. Microeconomics focuses on supply and demand and other forces that determine the price levels seen in the economy. For example, microeconomics would look at how a specific company could maximize it's production and capacity so it could lower prices and better compete in its industry.Macroeconomics, on the other hand, is the field of economics that studies the behavior of the economy as a whole and not just on specific companies, but entire industries and economies. This looks at economy-wide phenomena, such as Gross National Product (GDP) and how it is affected by changes in unemployment, national income, rate of growth, and price levels. For example, macroeconomics would look at how an increase/decrease in net exports would affect a nation's capital account or how GDP would be affected by unemployment rate.While these two studies of economics appear to be different, they are actually interdependent and complement one another since there are many overlapping issues between the two fields. For example, increased inflation (macro effect) would cause the price of raw materials to increase for companies and in turn affect the end product's price charged to the public.The bottom line is that microeconomics takes a bottoms-up approach to analyzing the economy while macroeconomics takes a top-down approach. Regardless, both micro- and macroeconomics provide fundamental tools for any finance professional and should be studied together in order to fully understand how companies operate and earn revenues and thus, how an entire economy is managed and sustained.
the contribution of macroeconomics to microeconomics
Economics is the branch of social science that studies the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The term economics comes from the Greek for oikos (h ouse) and nomos (custom or law), hence "rules of the house(hold) Modern Economics developed out of the broader field of political economy in the late 19th century, owing to a desire to use an empirical approach more akin to the physical sciences The subject thus defined involves the study of choices as they are affected by incentives and resources.Areas of economics may be divided or classified into various types, including: * microeconomics and macroeconomics * positive economics ("what is") and normative economics ("what ought to be") * mainstream economics and heterodox economics * fields and broader categories within economics. source: www.en.wikipedia.org
importance of statistics in field of economics
Macroeconomics is the branch of economics that deals with aggregate economic decision or behavior of an economy as a whole; for example, the problem of inflation, level of unemployment, and payment of a deficit. To put it simply, it studies the economy as a whole.In contrast, Microeconomics is the branch of economics that studies the behavior of an individual decision-making unit such as an individual firm, their relationship with the market, at what price to set a commodity, how much of a commodity should be produced, how an individual uses their income to maximize satisfaction, and how the price of each commodity in the market is affected by the forces of supply and demand.For example, macroeconomics deals with GDP, inflation, interest rates, and unemployment. Microeconomics deals with the economics of health care or agriculture or labor. For instance, a macroeconomist would study GDP numbers, Fed moves, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, or the Producer Price Index. A microeconomist, on the other hand, might attempt to study the economics of labor (ie: unions, labor shifts, etc).Although "micro" means small and "macro" means large, the two shouldn't be separated by the size of an economy or firm. For example, Wal-Mart may be many times the size of the economy of a small nation; however, Wal-Mart's costs and supply/demand curves will be governed by microeconomic decisions while the GDP of the small economy is an aspect of macroeconomics.More Information:Microeconomics is generally the study of individuals and business decisions; macroeconomics looks at higher up country and government decisions. Macroeconomics and microeconomics, and their wide array of underlying concepts, have been the subject of a great deal of writings. The field of study is vast; here is a brief summary of what each covers:Microeconomics is the study of decisions that people and businesses make regarding the allocation of resources and prices of goods and services. This means also taking into account taxes and regulations created by governments. Microeconomics focuses on supply and demand and other forces that determine the price levels seen in the economy. For example, microeconomics would look at how a specific company could maximize it's production and capacity so it could lower prices and better compete in its industry.Macroeconomics, on the other hand, is the field of economics that studies the behavior of the economy as a whole and not just on specific companies, but entire industries and economies. This looks at economy-wide phenomena, such as Gross National Product (GDP) and how it is affected by changes in unemployment, national income, rate of growth, and price levels. For example, macroeconomics would look at how an increase/decrease in net exports would affect a nation's capital account or how GDP would be affected by unemployment rate.While these two studies of economics appear to be different, they are actually interdependent and complement one another since there are many overlapping issues between the two fields. For example, increased inflation (macro effect) would cause the price of raw materials to increase for companies and in turn affect the end product's price charged to the public.The bottom line is that microeconomics takes a bottoms-up approach to analyzing the economy while macroeconomics takes a top-down approach. Regardless, both micro- and macroeconomics provide fundamental tools for any finance professional and should be studied together in order to fully understand how companies operate and earn revenues and thus, how an entire economy is managed and sustained.
Macroeconomics is the branch of Economics that deals with aggregate economic decision or behavior of an economy as a whole; for example, the problem of inflation, level of unemployment, and payment of a deficit. To put it simply, it studies the economy as a whole.In contrast, Microeconomics is the branch of economics that studies the behavior of an individual decision-making unit such as an individual firm, their relationship with the market, at what price to set a commodity, how much of a commodity should be produced, how an individual uses their income to maximize satisfaction, and how the price of each commodity in the market is affected by the forces of supply and demand.For example, macroeconomics deals with GDP, inflation, interest rates, and unemployment. Microeconomics deals with the economics of health care or agriculture or labor. For instance, a macroeconomist would study GDP numbers, Fed moves, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, or the Producer Price Index. A microeconomist, on the other hand, might attempt to study the economics of labor (ie: unions, labor shifts, etc).Although "micro" means small and "macro" means large, the two shouldn't be separated by the size of an economy or firm. For example, Wal-Mart may be many times the size of the economy of a small nation; however, Wal-Mart's costs and supply/demand curves will be governed by microeconomic decisions while the GDP of the small economy is an aspect of macroeconomics.More Information:Microeconomics is generally the study of individuals and business decisions; macroeconomics looks at higher up country and government decisions. Macroeconomics and microeconomics, and their wide array of underlying concepts, have been the subject of a great deal of writings. The field of study is vast; here is a brief summary of what each covers:Microeconomics is the study of decisions that people and businesses make regarding the allocation of resources and prices of goods and services. This means also taking into account taxes and regulations created by governments. Microeconomics focuses on supply and demand and other forces that determine the price levels seen in the economy. For example, microeconomics would look at how a specific company could maximize it's production and capacity so it could lower prices and better compete in its industry.Macroeconomics, on the other hand, is the field of economics that studies the behavior of the economy as a whole and not just on specific companies, but entire industries and economies. This looks at economy-wide phenomena, such as Gross National Product (GDP) and how it is affected by changes in unemployment, national income, rate of growth, and price levels. For example, macroeconomics would look at how an increase/decrease in net exports would affect a nation's capital account or how GDP would be affected by unemployment rate.While these two studies of economics appear to be different, they are actually interdependent and complement one another since there are many overlapping issues between the two fields. For example, increased inflation (macro effect) would cause the price of raw materials to increase for companies and in turn affect the end product's price charged to the public.The bottom line is that microeconomics takes a bottoms-up approach to analyzing the economy while macroeconomics takes a top-down approach. Regardless, both micro- and macroeconomics provide fundamental tools for any finance professional and should be studied together in order to fully understand how companies operate and earn revenues and thus, how an entire economy is managed and sustained.
The economist who developed the concept of Partial Analysis is Alfred Marshall. He was a prominent figure in neoclassical economics and his work on Partial Analysis helped to establish the foundations of microeconomics. Marshall's ideas greatly influenced the development of economic theory and his Principles of Economics is considered a seminal work in the field.
The term micro is derived from Greek word 'mikros' meaning 'small' and the term macro is derived from the Greek word 'makros' meaning 'large'. Thus, Micro economics studies the economic behaviour of individual decision making units such as consumers, resource owners and business firms. It makes a microscopic study o the economy. Whereas, Macro economics is concerned with the analysis of the behaviour of the whole economy. It deals with those aggregates which relate to the whole economy like total consumption, total investment, total savings, etc. Microeconomics is the study of small part of the whole economy. It deals with particular firms, household, individual, prices wages, incomes, individuals, industries, particular commodities. On the other hand the word Macro means large in scope, and explains the bigger picture, or universal. Microeconomics is the study of decisions that people and businesses make regarding the allocation of resources and prices of goods and services. This means also taking into account taxes and regulations created by governments. Microeconomics focuses on other forces that determine price levels for specific companies in specific industry sectors. For example, microeconomics would look at how a specific company could maximize it's production and capacity so it could lower prices and better compete in its industry. Macroeconomics, on the other hand, is the field of economics that studies the behavior of the economy as a whole and not just on specific companies, but entire industries and economies. This looks at economy-wide phenomena such as Gross National Product (GDP) and how it is affected by changes in unemployment, national income, rate of growth, and price levels. For example, macroeconomics would look at how an increase/decrease in net exports would affect a nation's capital account or how GDP would be affected by unemployment rate. While these two studies of economics appear to be different, they are actually interdependent and complement one another since there are many overlapping issues between the two fields. For example, increased inflation (macro effect) would cause the price of raw materials to increase for companies and in turn affect the end product's price charged to the public. The bottom line is that microeconomics takes a bottoms-up approach to analyzing the economy while macroeconomics takes a top-down approach. Regardless, both micro- and macroeconomics provide fundamental tools for any finance professional and should be studied together in order to fully understand how companies operate and earn revenues and thus, how an entire economy is managed and sustained. Macro economics is the study of an entire national economy, or an international economy. It is what is usually meant by the term economics. Micro economics is the application of economic theory to a smaller economic system such as a single family or business. Macro- and microeconomics, and their wide array of underlying concepts, have been the subject of a great deal of writings. The field of study is vast; here is a brief summary of what each covers:
What led to the emergency of managerial economics as a separate field of study
for micro we are studying the economic systems in general but as for macro we are now `looking at the world 's economy as a whole
Stephen Knowles is known for his work in the field of macroeconomics and development economics, particularly on topics related to aid effectiveness and poverty reduction in developing countries. He has published various academic papers on these subjects and is recognized for his contributions to the field.
state and mention one field of diciplane related to economics
To find Mr. Economics, one can study economics as a subject or profession, attend economics-related events or conferences, or seek out experts in the field of economics for guidance and mentorship.