Recent changes in unemployment calculation, such as the inclusion of more comprehensive data sources and adjustments for seasonal variations, have improved the accuracy of reported unemployment rates by providing a more nuanced and reliable picture of the job market.
They created the NRA Which then helped unemployed man find jobs, they built buildings such as hospitals and librays etc.. therefore creating new jobs for poor living men. research this stuff dude
Ida Tarbell reported on the corrupt business practices at Standard Oil.
5%
President Obama never promised that unemployment would remain below 8%. Members of his economic transition team (who would become members of his administration once he was inaugurated) released a report in early January that essentially said that stimulus was needed and then projected what the unemployment picture would look like if the Congress provided some stimulus. They projected that without stimulus, the unemployment rate would hit about 9 percent in 2010 and with stimulus, it could hold just under 8 percent. Their projections were wrong. As was the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office that reported similar projections. The problem is that neither the incoming Obama administration (or outgoing Bush admin) or the CBO knew just how bad the recession really was. In the month they made the projection, the country lost 750,000 jobs. In February 2009, the nation lost another 650,000 jobs marking the first time since 1939 (we know what happened then) that the nation had lost at least 600,000 jobs in 3 consecutive months. In other words, everyone's projections were off because their economic models were based on inaccurate (and un-heard of) data. In short, the President never "promised" to keep unemployment below 8%. In fact, before he picked curtains for the Oval Office it was already at 8.1%. This is just a political ploy by the President's political opponents. This stuff is complicated enough without misinformation.
products and income that are not reported as income to the government
Yes, any income received is required to be reported.
The last reported unemployment rate (March 2012) for the State of Delaware was 6.9%.
If you received income from someone (such as someone else's SSI), it would have to be reported to the unemployment office, which could reduce or eliminate your unemployment benefit
Sure, but any income made besides your unemployment, by law, must be reported on your weekly claim for benefits.
Two sf.
You are going to have to correct the error.
Yes, the reported molarity of the vinegar sample could be affected by an error in weighing because the amount of vinegar used in the titration would be inaccurate. This would result in a molarity calculation that is not precise and could lead to incorrect results.
The last reported data shows Chile's unemployment rate as 7.80% (9/17/09). See the Related Link below for more information
According to the Related Link below, Bangladesh had an unemployment rate of only 2.5 % (but its data was reported in 2008). The Link has all the countries rates, and by different dates.
Since the majority of Scandinavians are reported to be nonbelievers, they believe neither in the accuracy of the Bible nor in miracles.
To determine the answer with the correct number of significant figures, first identify the significant figures in each of the numbers involved in the calculation. The final result should be reported based on the number with the least significant figures among the values used. For addition and subtraction, the answer should be reported to the least precise decimal place, while for multiplication and division, it should match the number of significant figures of the least precise number used in the calculation.
Your eligibility for unemployment benefits is not affected by the fact that your spouse is your boss. What matters is whether your boss has been deducting money from your paycheck to pay your unemployment insurance premiums. If the premiums have been paid, then you are insured, and you qualify for benefits.