it lowered the cost of products
Eliminating competition.
Critics argued that trusts stifled competition by allowing large corporations to dominate markets, leading to monopolistic practices that drove smaller businesses out of operation. This concentration of economic power hindered innovation and choice for consumers, as fewer companies controlled prices and quality. Additionally, trusts were seen as corrupting the political system through lobbying and influence, further undermining the principles of a free enterprise system that relies on fair competition and equal opportunity.
water is necessary for life, is the marginal benefit of water is large or small?
The society benefit throughconsumer benefitemployee benefit
B) only large-scale methods of production and distribution could provide superior products at low prices. :)
trusts~apex
trusts~apex
Supporters of trusts argued that they created efficiencies through economies of scale, reduced competition, and allowed for better resource allocation, which could lead to lower prices and improved products for consumers. They believed that large corporations could drive innovation and economic growth. In contrast, opponents of trusts contended that they stifled competition, led to monopolistic practices, and exploited consumers and workers. They argued that trusts concentrated power and wealth in the hands of a few, undermining fair market principles and democratic ideals.
President Theodore Roosevelt viewed trusts, or large corporate monopolies, with a mix of skepticism and pragmatism. He believed that while some trusts could promote efficiency and innovation, many were creating unfair competition and exploiting consumers. As a result, he championed the regulation of these trusts through antitrust measures, most notably with the Sherman Antitrust Act, to ensure fair competition and protect the public interest. Roosevelt's approach was to distinguish between "good" trusts that benefited society and "bad" trusts that harmed it.
Just like the corporations of today they gave large donations to politicians and made sure that they had laws and taxes passes to benefit them.
the break-up of large trusts
Organize unions
Community land trusts are set up as non-profit organizations for the purpose of owning and preserving land through stewardship. Each organization decides on its mission and then begins to acquire title to any land that it can afford to purchase, mostly undeveloped land such as farms, wetlands, wildlife habitats, coastlines, land along waterways, etc. The land can then be used for passive public recreation. Land trusts benefit the community by conserving and protecting large green areas from development and provide the public with access to nature.
Eliminating business
trusts~apex
trusts
Eliminating competition.