It allows for a standard cost pricing to be established on goods and services and the regulation of that pricing. since you got money you could pay your taxes, if you paid your taxes you wouldn't have to serve in the army. you could also buy and sell property
The Lydian economy transitioned from a barter system, where goods and services were exchanged directly, to a money economy characterized by the introduction of coinage. This shift facilitated more efficient trade by providing a standardized medium of exchange, reducing the complexities and limitations of barter. The use of coins allowed for greater ease in transactions and contributed to the growth of commerce and economic stability in Lydia. Ultimately, this transformation marked a significant advancement in economic practices, laying the groundwork for future monetary systems.
The problem with this is that reason is subjective. So whatever answer you get for this may change. And my answer is purely what I think should occur, but it may not be realistic: I would think barter is is a good monetary policy for an economy in a recession, as well as heavy taxation of the rich (25% and over), because the problem with selling things in a recession is that people may or may not have the money for what you're offering, but they want it. So they can barter with you for it. You can in turn trade in these goods to a bank for money. It's a merger between barter and actual money.
yes
badly
The South had developed a more balanced economy after Reconstruction
The Lydian economy transitioned from a barter system, where goods and services were exchanged directly, to a money economy characterized by the introduction of coinage. This shift facilitated more efficient trade by providing a standardized medium of exchange, reducing the complexities and limitations of barter. The use of coins allowed for greater ease in transactions and contributed to the growth of commerce and economic stability in Lydia. Ultimately, this transformation marked a significant advancement in economic practices, laying the groundwork for future monetary systems.
increased trade and an easier method of payment, a change from the barter method to amoney economy occured, a standardization of prices and payments throughout the land.
interchange, change, trade, switch, swap, barter
The problem with this is that reason is subjective. So whatever answer you get for this may change. And my answer is purely what I think should occur, but it may not be realistic: I would think barter is is a good monetary policy for an economy in a recession, as well as heavy taxation of the rich (25% and over), because the problem with selling things in a recession is that people may or may not have the money for what you're offering, but they want it. So they can barter with you for it. You can in turn trade in these goods to a bank for money. It's a merger between barter and actual money.
In medieval times, Jews were utterly mistreated.
Art did change in the Medieval times because of the emergence of the early Renaissance period.
In medieval times, Jews were utterly mistreated.
Economy needed to change.
the
yes
I do believe that you press m to change class and n to change teams.
industrialization