The power or right to command or make final decisions typically rests with individuals or entities in positions of authority, such as leaders, managers, or governing bodies. This authority is often granted by legal, organizational, or social structures, depending on the context. Ultimately, the legitimacy of such power can derive from consent, expertise, or established rules and norms within a given system.
to make money
to make money
social obligation - needs to obey the rules social responsiveness - make the rules social responsibility - taking more pro active stance on action
A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people
Social Darwinism provided a justification for their wealth and success by suggesting that they were inherently superior to others. It also promoted the idea that wealth and power were the result of natural selection and survival of the fittest, thus legitimizing their position in society. This belief system allowed millionaires to avoid feelings of guilt or responsibility for the economic inequality and social injustices of the time.
Social Darwinism argues for the survival of the fittest, and therefore if someone has become "unfit" in society, then they would and should be left behind to make way for the more successful generation of people who have the factors that allow them to succeed in theirenvironment, the marketplace.
The idea of social Darwinism was created by English philosopher Herbert Spencer and Yale professor William Graham Sumner by applying Darwin's theory of evolution to society as a whole. Social Darwinism is the theory that the fittest in the social order survive, just as the fittest in nature survive. According to this theory, the only reason that the rich are rich is because they were the most fit to become so, and if the laborers were fit to do the same then they would be rich as well. Reform Darwinism, created by Brown University Professor Lester Frank Ward, follows the idea that because humans are intelligent beings, we can affect natural selection. Contrasting the social Darwinism thought of "survival of the fittest," reform Darwinism argues that government and society should make as many people as possible "fit to survive." The main difference between the two schools of thought is that social Darwinists believe that however social hierarchy exists, it is solely because the "fittest" rose to the top, reform Darwinists believe that the whole of society should be given the opportunities and resources to be able to rise to the top, rather than just the wealthy being able to do so.
If the poor can't make a living and are thus going to die, then they are weeded out of the social gene pool. Those who cannot keep from floundering flounder, and others don't.The theory of social Darwinism is based on Charles Darwin's survival of the fittest theory. Social Darwinists believed that individuals should have the freedom to pursue success and either succeed or fail. Those who failed or did not try would benefit from the success of those who were "fit" enough to succeed. In order for the "fit" to succeed, the government should not interfere. Under the theory of social Darwinism, corporations had to compete in order to succeed.
Social Darwinism assumes that the poor who are exploited by big business are inferior and deserve their fate because they lack the ability to compete in a competitive society. This ideology also suggests that the wealthy and successful individuals are biologically superior and have earned their status through natural selection and survival of the fittest.
Europeans went through periods of Social-Darwinism, in which they believed Europeans were the dominate race. This caused Europeans to conquer peoples' lands all over the world. They also used to acquire wealth and power and labor by doing so. And at the same time, they were trying to spread Christianity along with other ideas.
Social Darwinism is a term used for ideologies which exploited ideas of survival of the fittest.To elitists strong nations were composed of white people who were successful at expanding their empires, and would survive in the struggle for dominance.
Darwin studied a lot of things but "Darwinism" usually means the theory of Natural Selection. This means individual living creatures in a community that are better adapted to the environment will have more babies, and over time their features will spread to be more prevalent in the community.Often people sum up this theory as "Survival of the fittest", which is more or less accurate. But when reduced to a slogan like this, it is easy to misunderstand the real idea and people begin to reapply the rule "Survival of the fittest" in places where it makes no sense.It begins to intersect with raciscm when someone says that XXX people are supposed to be the bosses of YYY people, because they already are the bosses and therefore must be naturally selected. This actually is not related to Natural Selection because Natural Selection has to do with how many offspring different individuals have. It is nothing to do with who's the boss, who's smarter or who's suited to a certain type of job.
Government
Absolutely not. Darwinism is a secular model - it does not make any statements for or against any deity. Many christians and other theist have seen ways to reconcile acceptance of such scientific models with their theistic beliefs.
World War 2
Yes, because you have to make a river come to the area to make a dam work with make hydro power.